Monday, March 31, 2008

Marriage Proposal on Bended Knee


There is no more immediately recognisable romantic gesture than a marriage proposal on bended knee.

But where did this custom originate, and why is it so popular today?

History of the Marriage Proposal on Bended Knee

There is no clear historical origin of the idea of proposing with a bent knee, but the gesture bears striking resemblance to many other ceremonial situations, including:

* Kneeling during prayers and other religious ceremonies, including wedding vows for some faiths.

* Kneeling while proposing, then, has the same solemn and spiritual connotation.

* Knights kneeling while being awarded honors from kings and queens.

* Offering or accepting a marriage proposal is just as much an honor as any medal or award.

* Bowing in supplication before a victorious enemy, typically as a gesture of surrender.

* Committing to a relationship is surrendering oneself to being part of a couple.

* Kneeling to genuflect when entering a church or temple.

* Again, proposing on bended knee is a sign of respect and spiritualism.

Regardless of the origin, the idea of asking for a loved one’s hand in marriage while partially kneeling is a highly symbolic gesture embodying the very essence of committing one’s life to another: the ideas of goodwill, honor, and trust in that one person is opening themselves completely to another without shame or any physical defenses.

The practical reason behind a bent knee proposal is that it puts the engagement ring in an elevated position between the couple, letting the light hit it clearly without being blocked by both individuals. This highlights the glitter of the ring as well as emphasizing the strength of the commitment.

***

The Surprise Engagement

is the Best Engagement

Present the Diamond Ring

at it's Most Beautiful

Diamond Imports

Kiss Her With A Diamond


Subscribe in a reader

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Industry Analysis: Consumers Losing Confidence, But Still Spending

Low US Dollar

March 28, 2008
Industry Analysis: Consumers Losing Confidence, But Still Spending


Tiffany & Co.'s fourth-quarter results offer an interesting perspective on the current economy. The 1% drop in same-store U.S. sales for the quarter ending Jan. 31 shows that consumer spending has slowed, but hardly dried up.

The Tiffany statement reported a higher per-transaction average, suggesting that top-end diamond and designer jewelry pieces held up well. Net sales in the U.S. grew 4% to $527.9 million. International retail sales rose 21% to $422.56 million in the quarter, boosted by a 40% rise in the Asia-Pacific region, excluding Japan, and 29% in Europe.

For the fiscal year ending Jan. 31, 2008, Tiffany's net sales grew 14.7% to $2.93 billion, while comparable-store sales increased 8% over the previous year.

The chief challenge faced by Tiffany and retail jewelers around the world is not slowing economies, but how to deal with the lofty prices of precious metals. Retailers who attempt to fully pass on the increases risk deterring consumers who might balk at the price tag or delay purchases in the expectation that prices will drop.

Some retailers have announced price increases -- one reason analysts gave for disappointing Valentine's Day sales -- but few of those increases reflected the full extent of higher metal costs.

AUCTIONS: As prices for top gems soar, the major auction houses are making sure there are plenty of items to tempt the ultra-wealthy.

Christie's is offering a 14.23-ct. rectangle-cut Fancy Intense pink diamond at its April 16 New York auction. The low estimate is $10 million, the high $15 million. The stone is owned by an unnamed jewelry collector who is also selling a diamond necklace that belonged to French Empress Eugénie in the 1850s (estimated at $4-$6 million) and many top Belle Époque, Art Nouveau and Art Deco designer pieces.

Christie's is also offering a 39.34-ct. D-IF cushion-cut type IIa diamond it compares to the similarly shaped Polar Star diamond, a Golconda stone owned by European royalty. ("Golconda" is the term applied to type IIa diamonds mined in India -- primarily the Golconda mine -- during the Mogul era.)

Christie's has several other million-dollar-plus diamonds up for bid at the New York auction, including a 29.91-ct. D-VVS1 cushion cut, and a number of fine emeralds and sapphires. There are far fewer major rubies in this sale than the previous one, with the exception of a 9.71-ct. stone identified as an unheated Burmese, carrying a top estimate of $500,000.

Christie's and Sotheby's have also packed extremely important diamonds and colored gems into their spring Hong Kong and Geneva sales, convinced the money is still there for such pieces.

TRADE: India's government and diamond industry have been waging diplomatic offensives with resource-rich nations in Africa.

India's Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council, accompanied by the country's minister of commerce, is visiting Namibia and Angola this week to discuss "beneficiation" and rough supplies. These diamond-producing countries have been actively pursuing an expansion of cutting operations within their own borders, which India regards as threatening to its 900,000 to 1 million member diamond workforce -- particularly because the polishing operations will likely focus on the larger, more easily worked goods that bring the most profit.

Minister of Commerce Jairam Ramesh said India must assist African nations' efforts to "move up the value chain." He emphasized that in the future India will find it difficult to source rough diamonds unless it demonstrates to African nations that it will collaborate actively in value addition within these producing countries.

Several key colored-gem producers also made a strong pitch to India's mining industry at a major Indo-African conference recently. Representatives of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mozambique and Zambia noted that India's mining companies were welcome to compete for "sensible" exploitation of their resources.

Mining was a key topic at the India-Africa Business Conclave, held March 19-21 in New Delhi. The conference, involving 20 African nations, was a precursor to the Indo-African summit conference to be held April 8.

MACRO: Consumer confidence took another sharp decline in March, according to the Conference Board Consumer Research Center. The Confidence Index stands at 64.5, down from 76.4 in February, and the Expectations Index declined to 47.9 from 58.0. The Present Situation Index sank to 89.2 from 104.0 in February.

"Consumers' confidence in the state of the economy continues to fade and the Index remains at a five-year low," said Lynn Franco, director of the Research Center. "The decline in the Present Situation Index implies that the pace of growth in recent months has weakened even further. Looking ahead, consumers' outlook for business conditions, the job market and their income prospects is quite pessimistic and suggests further weakening may be on the horizon. The Expectations Index, in fact, is now at a 35-year low, a level not seen since the Oil Embargo and Watergate."

Slowing retail sales are also taking a toll on U.S. shopping malls. The International Council of Shopping Centers predicts that 5,770 mall stores will close this year, the highest number in four years. Russell Shor Senior Industry Analyst


***

Diamond Imports


Subscribe in a reader

Rare Fancy Intense Pink 14.23 carat VVS2

Christies Auction
Sale Title

RARE JEWELS AND GEMSTONES
***
THE EYE OF A CONNOISSEUR

Location
New York, Rockefeller Plaza
Sale Date Apr 15, 2008
Lot Number 1115 Sale Number 2121

Estimate
10,000,000 - 15,000,000 U.S. dollars

Lot Description
AN EXTREMELY RARE COLORED DIAMOND RING
Set with a rectangular-cut fancy intense pink diamond, weighing approximately
14.23 carats Emerald Cut
to the micro pavé-set pink diamond hoop, mounted in 18k rose gold
With report 14432611 dated 16 May 2005
from the Gemological Institute of America
stating that the diamond is
Fancy Intense Pink Natural Colour
VVS2 clarity
***
Follow up story:

High Flying Diamond Intrigue : Jewellers,Auctioneers, Bankers, Lawyers, Celebrities


***

Diamonds of Excellence

Investing in Diamonds: The Terms of Engagement

" This volatile investment market is one to watch "

Diamond investments may turn up profits “in the rough”
Published on: Thursday, March 27, 2008 Written by: Melana Yanos

Buying diamonds as gifts and as jewelry is a common practice, but investing in diamonds is not for the average person. After all, the most economically feasible diamond investments still require access to a tremendous amount of capital and high tolerance of risk.

Diamonds have been notoriously difficult to sell on the resale market at a profit; in order to make money, diamond investors need to find a buyer who is willing to pay more for their stone than they did. Nevertheless, diamond investments are being viewed as increasingly attractive as a result of recent trends that suggest a diminishing global supply.

Multifaceted investments
Diamonds carry unique attributes that distinguish them from other types of investments. As a highly concentrated asset, diamonds are extremely portable and easy to have on one’s person at all times as jewelry or loose stones. Investing in diamonds also carries benefits of financial privacy and complete ownership.

Diamond values are not directly linked to stock and bond markets. Diamond prices have increased an average of 15 percent each year since 1949, according to statistics published by diamond manufacturer Ajediam on their company website.

[ The Diamond Guru: Not so. Prices crashed overnight in 1980 when De Beers decided to flood the market with USD$8 billion of their own reserves in order to gain control and flush out rough diamonds that were being stored by cutters. It has taken over 25 years for consumer confidence to reach today's levels. Fortunately De Beers only control 40% of today's market as opposed to nearly 80% back in 1980 ]

“Diamonds do hold their value well,” Chuck Jaffe wrote in his syndicated column last December. “So long as the stone is real, it’s not going to zero like a company headed for bankruptcy.”

International demand for diamonds appears to be on the rise, especially as an increasing number of high net worth individuals emerge in the Russian, Middle Eastern and Asian markets. The emerging middle class in China is expected to create a sharp increase in demand for diamonds and other luxury goods, according to an article in The Financial Post last June.

Extremely rare stones seem to carry the highest potential for strong performance and returns. The values of colored diamonds, for instance, have roughly doubled every six to seven years during the past 35 years, Stephen Hershoff, senior executive and managing director at Pastor-Genève, said in an e-mail interview.

Furthermore, “the colored diamond market has always been an asset class that has held its value during recessions and economic downturns,” he said.

Colored diamonds are exceptionally scarce when compared to the white variety; in terms of natural supply, the ratio of white to colored stones is approximately 10,000-to-1, according to an article posted on the Pastor-Genève website last October.

Investing in diamonds, however, is a high-risk endeavor. Regardless of the quality and appraised value of the stone, an investor’s ability to reap a profit is at the mercy of what a buyer is willing to pay.

“Diamonds are appraised and graded, but prices move based on consumer sentiment,” Jaffe wrote.

Diamonds are not especially liquid, and an investor who wishes to sell his or her diamond in order to obtain quick cash can suffer enormous losses.

“Dealers who buy jewelry don’t pay retail, and the nation’s pawn shops are full of expensive gems that were turned in for a lot less cash than they were purchased for,” Jaffe wrote.
Even colored diamonds “take some time to sell,” Hershoff said.

“There are no specific bids and offers on a daily basis,” he said. “It is more like art, coins or land in that you have to watch for similar sales to get an idea of price performance.”

If diamonds are bought at retail prices—generally two to three times more than true wholesale prices—there is “no shot” of selling them for a profit for at least a decade, Jaffe said.

[ The Diamond Guru :There are several factors contributing to low liquidity of diamonds. One of the main is the lack of terminal market. Most commodities have terminal markets, and some form of commodities exchange, clearing house, and central storage facilities. This does not exist for diamonds. Diamonds are also subject to value added tax in the Unites Kingdom, Europe, Goods & Services Tax in Australia and sales tax in most developed countries, therefore reducing their effectiveness as an investment medium. Most diamonds are sold through retail stores at very high profit margins. This is due to high overhead costs of operating a jewelry retail store ]

And as a highly concentrated and portable asset, diamonds can be easily lost or stolen without proper security measures.

Recent history serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for diamond scams. In the late 1970s, a large number of fraudulent investment firms engaged in a phone campaign to sell mail-order diamonds, according to a chapter in The Diamond Invention by Edward Jay Epstein. In addition, many of the firms held diamond-investment seminars in expensive hotels and sold sealed packets of diamonds to the audience.

Although the sealed packets distributed through seminars and by mail included certificates guaranteeing the quality of the diamonds—so long as the packets remained sealed—buyers were in for an unpleasant surprise.

“Customers who broke the seal [in order to verify the quality of the diamonds] often learned from independent appraisers that their diamonds were of a quality inferior to that stated,” Epstein wrote. “Many were worthless.”

In general, investors who know little about diamonds and how to buy them can be especially ripe targets for unscrupulous dealers.

Mining the diamond market
Diamond investments are often met with pessimism and, at times, downright condescension. Jaffe, for instance, wrote about diamonds in his syndicated column, titled Stupid Investment of the Week, last December. Diamonds may provide a terrific return as an “investment in emotion,” but “try to cash in a diamond for a profit and you have all sorts of trouble,” he wrote.

But is investing in diamonds as imprudent as it sounds? Counter to what the skeptics might expect, institutional investors are beginning to enter the diamond investment market. Swiss firm Diapason Commodities has been raising money for the launch of its Diamond Circle Capital product, according to an article published in Investment Adviser last June.

The fund will only buy polished diamonds worth more than £506,000, or approximately $1 million. The product will be the first London Stock Exchange listed fund to invest in diamonds and trade them on the secondary market.

The state of the diamond market is even more compelling.

Diamond supply is declining for the first time in 30 years and it is primarily happening in areas where they find rare colored diamonds,” Hershoff said.

The leading mine in Australia, which produces 90 percent of the world’s pink diamonds, saw a drop of 30 percent last year in supply, he said. An additional decline of 20 to 30 percent is expected for this year.

“Pink diamonds are becoming more and more difficult to source, which is putting tremendous upward pressure on prices,” he said.

In addition, the balance of supply and demand for diamonds—and consequently, their pricing—is no longer artificially controlled by the DeBeers company, which historically owned more than 80 percent of the market.

“DeBeers is no longer the controlling factor that it once was 30 years ago,” Hershoff said. “[Their] market share has dropped to just over 40 percent of world supply; they have sold off their stockpile, and missed out on new discoveries in Canada, Australia, Russia and Central Africa.”

How to invest in diamonds
Diamond investments are probably not suitable for most investors because of the amount of capital required.

[ The Diamond Guru : Diamonds are a problematic investment. While it is easy to buy a diamond, it is not easy to sell one unless one is already an established diamond merchant. Establishing a trusted relationship with a diamond merchant similar to a stockbroker involves more than purchasing diamonds. One needs to understand diamonds. Just like not all stockbrokers are experts in their fields likewise there are a lot of diamond merchants too whose expertise is very questionable.

However we disagree with the author on the amount of capital required to invest. Real Estate property investments tend to cost a lot more than diamond " investments " ] .

“The new breed [of diamond investors] are probably already millionaires and—unlike the majority of normal investors—able to shoulder losing up to £50,000, the minimum you would spend on investment diamonds,” according to the article posted on the Pastor-Genève website last October

There are ways to mitigate the risk of enormous losses, though. If investors decide to buy, they should follow two basic rules: first, they should buy diamonds at wholesale or near-wholesale prices; and second, they should only buy diamonds that have been internationally certified by one of the major gemological laboratories, such as the Gemological Institute of America (GIA).

[ The Diamond Guru : In light of the GIA bribery scandal ," Certifigate " , and our strong support of Chaim Even-Zohar's revelations, Diamond Imports refuse to stock ANY NEW GIA graded diamonds offered to us both for ethical reasons and in our opinion many inaccurate diamond colour and clarity grades.

Likewise anyone dealing in GIA graded diamonds is NOT someone we wish to deal with until GIA’s Gem Trade Laboratory decides to disclose the bribers' names and comes clean in order to inadvertently avoid dealing with a GIA briber.

Diamond vendors can not be absolved of any wrong doing hiding behind a diamond grading report recognised or unrecognised.

Diamond Imports have both a moral and ethical duty of care to their clients

GIA is NOT an IDC diamond grading laboratory.

Their colour grading standards are simply not as strict and Diamond Imports is not prepared to jeopardise their reputation unlike other diamond vendors who sell any diamond just for the sake of closing a sale.

There are numerous diamond grading laboratories, and there is no easy way for investors, consumers, or even dealers to know the relative competence and integrity of each. See NON compliant diamond grading laboratories here.

Even the market-leading Gemological Institute of America (GIA) suffered embarrassment recently when a small number of large, important and valuable diamonds were overgraded, resulting in legal action by one dealer against the dealer who had submitted them to the GIA for grading.

This scandal has become known as Certifigate.

A number of GIA employees left after the scandal emerged, and the GIA has changed a number of its procedures.

There are also a number of laboratories affiliated to CIBJO. There must be commercial pressure on all labs to upgrade marginal stones or lose business to other labs who are prepared to reduce standards.

Read more here:How GIA Grades Diamonds: The Real Truth ]

Investors should try to obtain stones that are as rare as possible, such as stones of the colored varieties. By virtue of their rarity, colored stones are comparatively easy to pass on and are “consequently popular investments,” according to the Pastor-Genève website.

It is important that colored diamonds are natural stones as opposed to synthetic creations, according to Hershoff. Synthetic colored diamonds are much more abundant and priced much lower than their authentic counterparts.

Investors should also be wary of buying uncut stones, which can be “extremely risky,” Hershoff said.

“The difference in value between the colored diamond grades once the stone is cut and polished can mean tens and even hundreds of thousands of dollars per carat,” he said.

[ The Diamond Guru: Polished and rough diamonds lack some of the desirable attributes of investment vehicles, including liquidity, homogeneity and fungibility.

Fungibility does not imply liquidity, and liquidity does not imply fungibility. Diamonds can be bought and sold (the trade is liquid), but individual diamonds are not interchangeable (diamonds are not fungible). Zimbabwean dollar bank notes are interchangeable in London (they are fungible there), but they are not easily traded there (they are not liquid in London).

However Round Brilliant Diamonds in D Colour and either IF or VVS1 Clarity in Excellent Proportions, Excellent Polish and Excellent Symmetry are considered fungibile amongst the Chinese community. The problem here lies that one must always verify the diamond, it's grading and the grading report are genuine if these diamonds are acceptable as hard currency.]

Because sales are largely unregulated, “finding a reputable broker is key,” according to the Pastor-Genève website. Performing due diligence on potential brokers can help protect an investor from abuse by unscrupulous individuals.

As is the case for any type of investment, investors should educate themselves as much as possible about diamonds and what factors could potentially affect their values.
When speculated properly, diamonds may prove to yield decent performance as medium- or long-term investments. However, a successful diamond investment will probably require the ultimate luxury: time.

“Most investors look at holding periods of at least five years,” Hershoff said. “When they do look to sell they allow a few months to broker the stone, whether at auction, at the dealer level, through trade shows or to retail buyers.”

Retail diamond prices are continuing to trend upwards but profitable margins on resale remain largely unproven. Still, if demand outstrips supply as industry experts predict, then diamonds present an enticing—though risky—opportunity for investment.

[ The Diamond Guru : The main positive investment parameter of diamonds is their high value per unit weight, which makes them easy to store and transport. A high quality diamond weighing as little as 2 or 3 grams could be worth as much as 100 kilos of gold. This extremely condensed value and portability does bestow diamonds as a form of emergency disaster fund. People and populations displaced by war or extreme upheaval have utilised this property successfully, and presumably will do so again in the future.]

***

Feb. 1, 2008 Industry Analysis: The Economy May Slow, but Diamond Cutters Won't

As economists debate the likelihood of a U.S. recession, diamond manufacturers in India, Israel and New York say they plan to sell to emerging markets rather than slow their production of polished stones.

Manufacturers continue to be more concerned about future supplies -- largely because of rough being redirected to African diamond operations and changes in the De Beers Diamond Trading Company (DTC) sightholder list -- than they are about the prospect of diminished demand in the U.S., even though it accounts for about 48% of world diamond sales."We anticipated the slowdown since last summer and have been sending our production to the fast-growing markets of the Far East and the domestic [Indian] retailers," said one major Indian manufacturer.

China, India and the Middle East have seen double-digit growth during the past five years. They still represent a relatively small portion of world demand, however, leaving some executives concerned about accumulating inventory and increasing debt.

Those diamond manufacturers who have scaled back their polishing operations because of the economy acknowledged that other, competing manufacturers will certainly purchase the rough they don't use, so it is unlikely there will be any decrease in polished diamond supplies this year.

This is supported by the fact that southern African "beneficiation" diamond cutting operations will undoubtedly continue to grow and, given the enormous political pressure for their success, will not be subject to supply cutbacks.

Despite slower-than-expected U.S. holiday sales, the DTC released large allocations of rough and raised prices an average of 3.5% at the Jan. 14-18 sight. Contrary to initial reports, the sight -- which totaled nearly $600 million -- included increases across the board, not just on the large, high-quality material.

Diamond manufacturers see this as a clear sign that the DTC has truly abandoned its longtime "custodianship" of the diamond market, withholding supplies and stabilizing prices when the market turned soft.While most U.S. retailers will turn in positive numbers for 2007, because the slowdown did not begin in earnest until September, economists warn that 2008 may bring sales declines.

This will force some retailers to retrench and lead to consolidation within the wholesale and manufacturing sectors of the industry.Indeed, that was the mood in Japan, the world's second largest consumer diamond market.

Dealers there are very pessimistic about their prospects for 2008, according to a Jewellery News Asia (JNA) survey. Diamond dealers who responded to JNA's spot survey said they believe sales will decline around 5%-15% or, at best, see a single-digit increase this year against a very lackluster 2007.

RETAIL: Demand for larger diamonds and top colored stones was the one bright spot for U.S. retail jewelers in 2007, but according to a just-released luxury market survey, that spot may be dimming as well.

According to a survey conducted by Unity Marketing, luxury consumer confidence for the final quarter of 2007 plunged to its lowest level since the survey began four years ago, as wealthy consumers adopted an increasingly pessimistic view of the U.S. economy. The report noted that spending among this group fell 20% during the holiday season and will continue to be soft as an increasing number of respondents claimed they would continue to cut back during 2008.

Confidence among general consumers declined in January, according to the Conference Board's monthly survey. January's Consumer Confidence Index fell to 87.9 from 90.6 in December, suggesting that consumers may continue to restrain their spending.

The Board found strong pessimism about the direction of the economy over the coming six months, particularly business conditions and employment prospects.MACRO: The world stock markets continued their volatility, while gold and platinum soared to all-time records in the wake of economic uncertainty.

This week opened with gold spotting at $927.50 per ounce, while platinum's per-ounce price broke the $1,700 barrier.The U.S. Federal Reserve, which last week issued its steepest interest rate cut in more than two decades (0.75%), added another half percent drop at this week's meeting, hinting at even further cuts if the economy fails to respond.

The downturn in the U.S. housing market and the related subprime mortgage meltdown are taking most of the blame for the current turmoil. Sales of new homes fell last year by 26%, the steepest drop since records began in 1963, the U.S. Commerce Department said on Monday.

In December, the median price of a new home was down 10.9% from December of the previous year.One bright spot appeared this week as the U.S. Commerce Department reported that demand for big-ticket durable goods rose 5.2% in December, more than a percentage point above what economists had predicted, prompting some to say that the economy has more underlying strength than many analysts believe.

The U.S. Congress is considering an economic stimulus package to jump-start consumer spending. Economists remain divided over whether or not the legislative package or the Federal Reserve rate cuts will have any real effect on improving the economy. Source: Russell ShorSenior Industry Analyst

***

Diamond Imports

Diamonds are Primarily a Consumer Item

Invest in Pleasure



Subscribe in a reader

Saturday, March 29, 2008

Trilliant Cut & Triangular Step Cut Diamonds


The standard number of facets of a Trilliant cut gemstone is 43.

Trilliant cut gemstones are based on a triangular shape.

Usually with truncated corners and displaying a variety of facet designs, this cut creates a spectacular wedge of brilliant fire.

The tips and culets of Trilliants are pointed and thin.

Some jewelers only bezel-set Trilliants, though prongs that protect the tips work well and show more of the gem.

As you look down through the gem, the culet generally appears centered in the middle of the table showing the pavilion of the gem with an attention to symmetry.

When you examine the gem in profile, the girdle and table facet are generally parallel.

The pavilion’s main facet usually extends from the culet perpendicularly until it intersects the girdle.

Because of their equilateral form, Trilliants return lots of light and color.

They are considered nearly as brilliant as Round cuts, so they are a great choice for customers who like brilliance but want something other than round.

Variations include rounded-corner triangles, modified shield cuts and triangular step cuts.

There should be as few polishing marks as possible and the surface should appear glossy and reflective.

Good polishing helps maximize brilliance and scintillation in Trilliants.

Trilliants work well with light-colored gems such as Diamonds where cutters try to maximize brilliance.

First developed in Amsterdam, the exact design can vary depending on a particular gem’s natural characteristics and the cutter's personal preferences.

It may be a traditional triangular shape with pointed corners or a more rounded triangular shape with 25 facets on the crown, 19 facets on the pavilion and a polished girdle.

Some twinned (a crystal growing within a crystal) Diamond rough is naturally triangular (called “Macle”) and is ideal for Trilliants.

Diamond Imports has a magnificent Triangular Step Cut 3.14 carat H SI2 Very Good Finish for sale ( DCLA Laser Inscribed #158136 ).

Additional reading : The Mystical Trilliant Cut Diamond

***

Diamond Imports

Trilliants


Subscribe in a reader

Celine Dion compensates dancers with diamond gifts


SHE is known worldwide as the down-to-earth diva with a bank account that would make King Solomon blush.

Now visiting superstar Celine Dion is also proving to be the queen of generosity, according to one of the dancers performing in her Taking Chances world tour.

Celine and her entourage arrived in Brisbane over the weekend in preparation for her first Australian show – at the Entertainment Centre on Wednesday night – and touched down after a gruelling 17-show run throughout South Africa, Dubai, China and Korea.

Though normally accustomed to five-star accommodation, a promoter error saw the show's dancers put up in some less-than-stellar lodgings on a handful of occasions leading up to their arrival in Brisbane.

To make it up to her devoted staff, Celine handed them all a small parcel recently to thank them for their patience.

And what was inside? Each dancer opened a box to find a large, gleaming two-carat diamond.

"It's huge. I've got no idea what to do with mine," one dancer told Qconfidential.

"But it's beautiful. She is so lovely to work for. All the dancers love her, she's amazing."

And the gift has a pretty amazing price tag. A jewellery expert tells us a diamond of that quality could fetch anything from $10,000 to $200,000. Not that it would make much of a dent in Celine's earnings.

The French-Canadian songbird, who holds world records in album and ticket sales, raked in just over $250 million from the three-year run of her A New Day show in Las Vegas. Source

***

Diamond Imports

All Our Diamonds Are In Stock



Subscribe in a reader

Sotheby's to Auction Rare Type IIa D Colour Diamond

The star lot of April’s jewelry auction, The Property of a Lady, Sold to Benefit a Charitable Foundation, is a magnificent Harry Winston diamond ring featuring an emerald-cut diamond weighing 24.42 carats.

This diamond ring (estimated value USD $1.8/2.5 million), mounted in platinum, is flanked by tapered baguette diamonds.

It is of exceptional D colour and potentially flawless clarity and falls into the rare category of type IIa, which includes the most chemically pure and colorless stones. The attractive proportions of this diamond when viewed from any angle make it a true Winston rarity.
Source:SOTHEBY’S NEW YORK SALE OF MAGNIFICENT JEWELS
TO BE HELD ON APRIL 17, 2008
***
Additional Reading:
***

Friday, March 28, 2008

Kimberley Process,Corruption & Integrity: Is it failing ? Certifigate 8


U.S. GOVERNMENT VIEWS ON LAUNDERING IN THE DIAMOND INDUSTRY

Once a year, the U.S. Department of State presents the U.S. Congress with an almost 1,000-page report on the state-of-the-world from a narcotics trade and money laundering perspective. Ostensibly there is little or no reason for diamonds to become an issue in this report, but in the just-released 2008 edition, one gets the impression that things aren’t well in the diamond world.

There are quite a few findings on which one might challenge their accuracy, but that may be a futile exercise. What is important is that the diamond industry should take note of the concerns identified by U.S. government, as the report generally serves as a basis for decisions on strategies and policies. What it is really troubling is that the report raises doubts about the effectiveness of the Kimberley Process. It is also (too) quick to put the “conflict diamonds” label on diamonds in places such as Belgium, Dubai and elsewhere.

The annual report on Money Laundering and Financial Crimes is a legislatively mandated section of the U.S. Department of State’s annual International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR). It represents an enormous effort and is based upon the contributions of numerous U.S. Government agencies and international sources. However, the principal contributor is the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which has also issued the Jewelry Rule, requiring the U.S. diamond and jewelry business to adopt AML/CFT compliance programs.

Indeed, FinCEN has been identified as “the primary contributor to the individual country reports.” That makes the U.S. views on the international diamond industry even more captivating – as they reflect the position of the very agency that regulates the U.S. diamond industry’s anti-money laundering efforts. So it is more than just another (major) government report – it clearly reflects the perceptions of FinCEN on the state of money laundering in the international diamond business.

It is important, however, not to lose perspective. As the industry is always concerned about consumer confidence, ethics and best practice principles, we are occasionally overlooking the fact that whatever infringements may take place in our business, they are virtually peanuts when seen in an overall context. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates the magnitude of money laundering to account for about three to five percent of the world’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Using 2007 World Bank data, global GDP is approximately $72.3 trillion. In other words, international money laundering can be estimated at between approximately $2.17 and $3.61 trillion a year, which is larger than the current U.S. budget. (Ten years ago, the generally accepted estimate of international money laundering was in the range of $300-$500 billion.)

But precisely because our industry’s possible infringements are so infinitely small in the overall context, we need to be concerned – and certainly not ignore – the significance FinCEN, other US governmental agencies, and the U.S. Department of States give to what is taking place in the diamond industry. The law that mandates the compiling of the annual report does not require a report on the United States, itself. If it would have, the GIA Certifigate scandal would certainly have been included in any reference to the diamond industry.

The report puts major diamond trading countries, such as India, Israel, the United States, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Switzerland, Russia, UAE, Hong Kong and the Netherlands, on the list of some 50 “major money laundering countries in 2008.” Belgium does not appear on that list. Let’s review some of the relevant country observations.

Country Observations

When discussing Angola, the report identifies “the laundering of funds derived from continuous and widespread high-level corruption as a concern, as is the use of diamonds as a vehicle for money laundering. Angola has implemented a diamond control system in accordance with the Kimberley Process. However, through the method of ‘mixing parcels’ of licit and illicit diamonds and the fraudulent purchasing of Kimberley Process ‘certificates of authenticity,’ the Kimberley Process can be compromised. Corruption and Angola’s long and porous borders further facilitate smuggling and the laundering of diamonds.”

The U.S. report is quite positive on Belgium, after it first dubiously concludes that “m ost of the ‘blood’ or ‘conflict diamonds’ from long-running African civil wars were processed in Antwerp. Authorities have transmitted a number of cases relating to diamonds to the public prosecutor, and that office is examining the sector closely in cooperation with local police and diamond industry officials.”

While complimenting the Kimberley certification process for “introducing much-needed transparency into the global diamond trade,” the report then concludes in the same sentence that “diamonds of questionable origin continue to appear on the Belgian market.” It then simply charges that “the Government of Belgium (GOB) recognizes the particular importance of the diamond industry, as well as the potential vulnerabilities it presents to the financial sector.” I really wonder who in the Belgian government would have conveyed such view to the U.S. State Department.

The report isn’t generous to India either. “India’s emerging status as a regional financial center, its large system of informal cross-border money flows, and its widely perceived tax avoidance problems all contribute to the country’s vulnerability to money laundering activities. Some common sources of illegal proceeds in India are narcotics trafficking, illegal trade in endangered wildlife, trade in illegal gems (particularly diamonds), smuggling, trafficking in persons, corruption, and income tax evasion.” I fail to understand how diamonds can be viewed as an “illegal gem” in India, and I hope that industry leaders will not fail to press for some explanation.

From the significant diamond countries, South Africa gets, perhaps, the worst criticism as being a center of “international crime groups,” which, naturally, are involved in “illegal dealings and theft of precious metals and diamonds” and a host of other criminal activity.

What troubles me is the apparent lack of evidence and absence of any sense of “proportionality” in the report’s frequent mentioning of diamonds. It reminds me of the rumors about a diamond connection to al-Qaeda and how they helped the Clean Diamonds Act to pass quickly through the U.S. Congress – even though FBI, CIA and other US government reports (including the 9/11 Commission Report) later conceded that there had never been an iota of evidence to such link beyond one journalist’s report.

The U.S. government report doesn’t mince words about the Dubai diamond business. “Dubai remains the center of the UAE’s burgeoning diamond trade, although new facilities are springing up in the Emirates of Ajman and Ras Al Khaimah as interest spreads in the lucrative business.” After discussing the quite elaborate legal frameworks, the report zooms in on a single smuggling transaction that was caught in 2006, when “Russian customs officials reportedly apprehended an air passenger from Dubai after he tried to smuggle 2.5 kilos of diamonds into the country. There are also reports that diamonds are increasingly being used as a medium to provide counter valuation in ‘hawala’ (informal remittances) transfers, particularly between Dubai and Mumbai.”

The alleged premature release of two questionable parcels is then cited to “ indicate continuing weaknesses in the [Kimberley] process.” A World Diamond Council report (?) was said to quote a local company that “stated that they had in their possession large quantities of African diamonds without Kimberley Process certification.” I find that hard to swallow.

Israel ’s diamond industry fared well in the report. It cited the first reading in the Knesset (Parliament) of a bill that imposes anti-money laundering rules on the diamond sector. The report also states that Israel’s “ Customs Authority continues to intercept unreported diamond shipments, despite the fact that Israel imposes no tariffs on diamond imports.”

Focusing on Lebanese Traders in Africa

The considerable attention the report is giving to diamonds in Lebanon might make one conclude that it is a major diamond trading center. It is not. The U.S. government recalls old information on diamond smuggling from the Congo, simply concluding that it has “serious doubts on Lebanon’s commitment to counter the trade in conflict diamonds.” It then cites the “consistent reports that many Lebanese diamond brokers in Africa are engaged in the laundering of diamonds—the most condensed form of physical wealth in the world.”

While describing the apparent, effective Kimberley Process operations at Beirut International Airport, the report nevertheless laments that all these “safeguards do not address the issue of smuggled diamonds, the purchase of fraudulently obtained Kimberley Process certificates, the laundering of diamonds, or value transfer via the diamond trade.”

“Lebanon has a large expatriate community throughout the Middle East, Africa, and parts of Latin America. They often work as brokers and traders. Many Lebanese ‘import-export’ concerns are found in free trade zones. Many of these Lebanese brokers network via family ties and are involved with underground finance and trade-based money laundering. Informal remittances and value transfer in the form of trade goods add substantially to the remittance flows from expatriates via official banking,” says the report to Congress.

“Expatriate Lebanese brokers are actively involved in the smuggling and laundering of diamonds in Africa. There are also reports that many in the Lebanese expatriate business community willingly or unwillingly give ‘charitable donations’ to representatives of Hezbollah (which is based in Lebanon). The funds are then repatriated or laundered back to Lebanon.”

Deterrence and Convictions are the Objectives

It isn’t so simple to place all these “findings” about diamonds in a proper perspective. It is clear that there is no other commodity in the world that has voluntarily embraced such a high level of monitoring of the flows of goods and moneys, or has adopted voluntary warranties along the value chain, while the governments in the countries where we operate have legislated dedicated diamond industry anti-money laundering regulations.

There are many factors that are simply beyond the controls of the diamond industry players, especially in Africa. The report signals that there are jurisdictions which are having trouble converting their anti-money laundering policies and programs into investigations, prosecutions, and convictions. “In some cases”, says the report, “the lack of enforcement is due to lack of capacity, but in far too many others it is due to a lack of political will.”

Virtually all diamond dealers in the United States and in the main trading partner countries have some kind of AML/CFT program, do client and supplier due diligence, report suspicious transactions – but, sometimes, this all seems frustratingly irrelevant in the total scheme of things. One of the concerns expressed in the report is that too many jurisdictions are getting caught up in the AML/CTF process and losing sight of the objective.

Financial intelligence is simply the process; the means to an end. Rather, says the report, “the objective continues to be anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism finance convictions. Convictions, combined with asset seizure and forfeiture are the true deterrents, the most meaningful ‘measurable,’ and the bottom line. Far too many jurisdictions continue to fall short in this regard.” This is so true.

With all the criticism and concerns about the diamond industry, one cannot escape the conclusion that the international diamond industry is doing its part. How can we impact the policies of governments such as DRC, Angola, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Russia and other relevant countries? The party that seems to be miserably failing is government, which is the only authority that can deliver indictments, convictions, asset seizures, etc. – but not just overseas.

Let’s look at the United States, the “author” of the report and leader in spearheading the international war against money laundering. As we have noted in last week’s column, New York diamond industry leaders are literally pleading and lobbying government to investigate and bring to justice those involved in one of the industry’s most serious bribing and laundering scandals. When you actually think about this, it is both strange and sad. But it is the way it is. Source: 27th March 2008 Chaim Even-Zohar

***

Diamond Imports

Fair Trade Diamonds


Subscribe in a reader

Diamond Grading to be topic of AGA Conference

The Accredited Gemologists Association’s Las Vegas conference will address the topic of diamond grading and what goes into the decision of a diamond grading report issued by various laboratories such as the Gemological Institute of America, American Gem Society, Gem Certification, and Assurance Lab.

The conference will take place May 30 from 1:30 to 5:30 p.m., at The Platinum Hotel and Spa.
By means of a “virtual” hands-on presentation, attendees can learn techniques never taught in any gemology course, plus tips on how the major labs make critical decisions related to high-clarity/high-color and “split grade” stones.

Speakers Dan Gillen, laboratory director of GCAL, New York, and Peter Yantzer, laboratory director of AGS Laboratories, Las Vegas, will share insights and grading tips gleaned from their many years’ experience grading diamonds at major international laboratories. Participants will then be able to better anticipate grades their diamonds might receive from major labs, and to grade more consistently with them.

The diamond grading workshop will be followed by a presentation of the AGA “Position Paper” on color-grading fluorescent diamonds and recommendations for important changes to procedures now used by diamond-grading laboratories. This follows information presented at the AGA Tucson conference, and incorporates subsequent research by AGA members. Copies of the paper will be available at the conference.

***

Diamond Imports


Subscribe in a reader

Kimberly Process,Corruption & Integrity: Is it failing ? Certifigate 8

Is GIA becoming the Diamond Industry's
Bread of Affliction ?
*
Are Diamond Dealers Slaves ?
*
"And thou shalt tell thy son" (Exod. 13:8) On Passover, we tell the story of the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt "
*
Diamonds, Politics & Religion

The following story from Chain Even-Zohar below confirms what suspicions we had in regard to the policing of the Kimberley Process.

Government failures in fraudulent activities to monitor money laundering and those that fund terrorism are not working effectively.

I spoke briefly last week with Mr Even-Zohar who believes nothing much has changed in the GIA and there are those who are maybe still continuing to behave dishonourably at GIA's Gem Trade Laboratory despite the many claims of GIA that they have taken effective measures to monitor themselves.

Despite GIA's campaign to improve it's tarnished image post Certifigate they will never be respected unless they name the GIA bribers.Their continued refusal and delay will only do further damage to their reputation.

Imagine a diamond grading report from an accredited organisation that on one hand does not condone the bribery yet refuses to name the bribers ? This is smoke and mirrors.

Under the US statute of limitations those GIA bribers and the fraud committed seem to be edging closer to immunity. GIA refuses to disclose the name of the bribers.

This is a disgrace for an organisation whose motto says " Integrity ".

Once again Diamond Imports refuse to stock any new GIA graded diamonds until the names of the bribers are disclosed and we will be strongly suggesting the same to all our clients. Our clients will tell their friends and so on and so on.... GIA instead of being once the shining example of diamond grading standards will become the pariah of the diamond world for failing it's supporters and betraying us all.

We are disillusioned that those larger diamond traders have not taken a stand against the GIA.

Their apathy is a terrible disappointment and tantamount to being guilty by association.

By the same token with the Jewish Passover approaching the historical symbolism behind this sacred festival has more meaning in light of those who have become slaves to the GIA.

Never was there a time like now when my fellow landsmen should protest and refuse to deal in tainted GIA diamond grading reports. Those who do are hypocrites. Their silence is a disgrace.

Jews and others should follow by example and let GIA understand the corruption of a once highly regarded diamond grading facility needs to be absolved in the interest of consumer confidence and that without naming the GIA bribers, the GIA will never recover it's prestigious reputation.

Those who turned a blind eye to the plight of those Jews exterminated in the death camps of Auschwitz can never be excused.Likewise those Jews who ignore the GIA fraud are also condoning it by turning a blind eye themselves hoping all will be swept under the carpet quickly to be forgotten over time.

It may be extreme but I compare those diamond dealers' inaction to those of the Jewish Police in the death camps, the "capos", who survived at the expense of their fellow Jews. The term "capo " was a colloquial term used by camp inmates.

It is a sad indictment that we too have " capos " within the diamond industry both here in Australia and elsewhere who are willing to comprimise their reputations for the sake of the dollar while colluding with GIA and bribery diamonds.

Like vice is condemned in our society as unsavoury so too are the " capos ".

Vice and Diamonds do not mix. Diamonds represent trust, purity and a feeling of goodness.

When a diamond is given for an engagement ring it symbolises love, devotion and trust.

Diamond dealers and jewellery retailers should ask themselves have they unknowingly sold a GIA bribery diamond ? If so how do they feel their reputations have been comprimised by unscrupulous people they trusted ? GIA's refusal to disclose the names of the GIA bribers is jeopardising another segment of the jewellery industry they are meant to be protecting.

In Diamonds We Trust ?

Not GIA anymore

If diamond dealers of the world trading in GIA graded diamonds fail in their duty of care they are no different to those "capos" that betrayed their fellow bretheren during the Holocaust.

Again I admit it may be conceived as being an extreme view but after the conflict diamonds issue has the diamond industry learnt it's lesson ?

GIA has been caught red handed and still they refuse to comply. Ask yourself why they do not want to name the bribers? My guess is that those who are named will open a whole new can of worms and the scandal will further expose even more than any of us knew.

GIA makes hundreds of millions of dollars based on it's reputation. Diamond dealers need to show some resolve and strength by rejecting GIA diamond grading reports as a protest until they name the GIA bribers.

Who knows? Maybe the Greedy Institute of Arrogance might then value their clients more and be forced to put pressure on the FBI to proceed with prosecutions of the guilty GIA bribers.

In the meantime all known GIA grading reports involved with any of the known bribers should be made void to protect both diamond dealers and consumers against any possible fraud.

This can be confirmed via their online GIA Report Check verification link.GIA can easily do this if they wanted to. GIA have the data.

GIA was created to instill consumer confidence. It's time they started to do this.

So far thay have mishandled the whole affair and continue with the charade of GIA bribery diamonds being resolved while those guilty of bribery will escape prosecution due their monetary influence and patronage. It stinks ! It's unfair !

Why would anyone in their right mind want to own a GIA graded diamond until we all know who we can trust ? I simply do not want to be caught dealing with a GIA briber inadvertently. I do not think this is unreasonable.

GIA Bribery Diamonds are Conflict of Interest Diamonds.

Online website diamond vendors advertise thousands of diamonds with supposedly GIA grading reports at ridiculously low prices. The report numbers are rarely shown.

GIA has become complicit in allowing this to occur. Surely the ethical trader would have the report number documented. GIA should insist that any one trading in GIA graded diamonds must document the grading report number to facilitate verification.

This would at least be a first step forward.

Hence now why GIA grading reports are now being referred as the Internet Certificate , a common report for the most ordinary diamond vendors marketing to the most mediocre clients used as bait to lure the unsuspecting consumer.

A diamond is a diamond with or without a grading report. There are other accredited and recognised diamond grading laboratories without the high profile of the GIA which are equally prestigious if not more.

* DIAMOND DEALERS CAN MAKE A LIVING WITHOUT GIA DIAMOND GRADING REPORTS.

* GIA HAS TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR PERPETUATING FRAUD.

* NAME THE GIA BRIBERS !

We reiterate in light of the GIA bribery scandal ," Certifigate " , and our strong support of Chaim Even-Zohar's revelations we refuse to stock ANY NEW GIA graded diamonds offered to us both for ethical reasons and many inaccurate diamond colour and clarity grades.

Likewise anyone dealing in GIA graded diamonds is NOT someone we wish to deal with until GIA’s Gem Trade Laboratory decides to disclose the bribers' names and comes clean in order to inadvertently avoid dealing with a GIA briber.

***

U.S. GOVERNMENT VIEWS ON LAUNDERING IN THE DIAMOND INDUSTRY
27 March 2008 Chaim Even-Zohar

Once a year, the U.S. Department of State presents the U.S. Congress with an almost 1,000-page report on the state-of-the-world from a narcotics trade and money laundering perspective. Ostensibly there is little or no reason for diamonds to become an issue in this report, but in the just-released 2008 edition, one gets the impression that things aren’t well in the diamond world.

There are quite a few findings on which one might challenge their accuracy, but that may be a futile exercise. What is important is that the diamond industry should take note of the concerns identified by U.S. government, as the report generally serves as a basis for decisions on strategies and policies. What it is really troubling is that the report raises doubts about the effectiveness of the Kimberley Process. It is also (too) quick to put the “conflict diamonds” label on diamonds in places such as Belgium, Dubai and elsewhere.

The annual report on Money Laundering and Financial Crimes is a legislatively mandated section of the U.S. Department of State’s annual International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR). It represents an enormous effort and is based upon the contributions of numerous U.S. Government agencies and international sources. However, the principal contributor is the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which has also issued the Jewelry Rule, requiring the U.S. diamond and jewelry business to adopt AML/CFT compliance programs.

Indeed, FinCEN has been identified as “the primary contributor to the individual country reports.” That makes the U.S. views on the international diamond industry even more captivating – as they reflect the position of the very agency that regulates the U.S. diamond industry’s anti-money laundering efforts. So it is more than just another (major) government report – it clearly reflects the perceptions of FinCEN on the state of money laundering in the international diamond business.

It is important, however, not to lose perspective. As the industry is always concerned about consumer confidence, ethics and best practice principles, we are occasionally overlooking the fact that whatever infringements may take place in our business, they are virtually peanuts when seen in an overall context. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates the magnitude of money laundering to account for about three to five percent of the world’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Using 2007 World Bank data, global GDP is approximately $72.3 trillion. In other words, international money laundering can be estimated at between approximately $2.17 and $3.61 trillion a year, which is larger than the current U.S. budget. (Ten years ago, the generally accepted estimate of international money laundering was in the range of $300-$500 billion.)

But precisely because our industry’s possible infringements are so infinitely small in the overall context, we need to be concerned – and certainly not ignore – the significance FinCEN, other US governmental agencies, and the U.S. Department of States give to what is taking place in the diamond industry. The law that mandates the compiling of the annual report does not require a report on the United States, itself. If it would have, the GIA Certifigate scandal would certainly have been included in any reference to the diamond industry.

The report puts major diamond trading countries, such as India, Israel, the United States, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Switzerland, Russia, UAE, Hong Kong and the Netherlands, on the list of some 50 “major money laundering countries in 2008.” Belgium does not appear on that list. Let’s review some of the relevant country observations.

Country Observations
When discussing Angola, the report identifies “the laundering of funds derived from continuous and widespread high-level corruption as a concern, as is the use of diamonds as a vehicle for money laundering. Angola has implemented a diamond control system in accordance with the Kimberley Process. However, through the method of ‘mixing parcels’ of licit and illicit diamonds and the fraudulent purchasing of Kimberley Process ‘certificates of authenticity,’ the Kimberley Process can be compromised. Corruption and Angola’s long and porous borders further facilitate smuggling and the laundering of diamonds.”

The U.S. report is quite positive on Belgium, after it first dubiously concludes that “m ost of the ‘blood’ or ‘conflict diamonds’ from long-running African civil wars were processed in Antwerp. Authorities have transmitted a number of cases relating to diamonds to the public prosecutor, and that office is examining the sector closely in cooperation with local police and diamond industry officials.”

While complimenting the Kimberley certification process for “introducing much-needed transparency into the global diamond trade,” the report then concludes in the same sentence that “diamonds of questionable origin continue to appear on the Belgian market.” It then simply charges that “the Government of Belgium (GOB) recognizes the particular importance of the diamond industry, as well as the potential vulnerabilities it presents to the financial sector.” I really wonder who in the Belgian government would have conveyed such view to the U.S. State Department.

The report isn’t generous to India either. “India’s emerging status as a regional financial center, its large system of informal cross-border money flows, and its widely perceived tax avoidance problems all contribute to the country’s vulnerability to money laundering activities. Some common sources of illegal proceeds in India are narcotics trafficking, illegal trade in endangered wildlife, trade in illegal gems (particularly diamonds), smuggling, trafficking in persons, corruption, and income tax evasion.” I fail to understand how diamonds can be viewed as an “illegal gem” in India, and I hope that industry leaders will not fail to press for some explanation.

From the significant diamond countries, South Africa gets, perhaps, the worst criticism as being a center of “international crime groups,” which, naturally, are involved in “illegal dealings and theft of precious metals and diamonds” and a host of other criminal activity.

What troubles me is the apparent lack of evidence and absence of any sense of “proportionality” in the report’s frequent mentioning of diamonds. It reminds me of the rumors about a diamond connection to al-Qaeda and how they helped the Clean Diamonds Act to pass quickly through the U.S. Congress – even though FBI, CIA and other US government reports (including the 9/11 Commission Report) later conceded that there had never been an iota of evidence to such link beyond one journalist’s report.

The U.S. government report doesn’t mince words about the Dubai diamond business. “Dubai remains the center of the UAE’s burgeoning diamond trade, although new facilities are springing up in the Emirates of Ajman and Ras Al Khaimah as interest spreads in the lucrative business.” After discussing the quite elaborate legal frameworks, the report zooms in on a single smuggling transaction that was caught in 2006, when “Russian customs officials reportedly apprehended an air passenger from Dubai after he tried to smuggle 2.5 kilos of diamonds into the country. There are also reports that diamonds are increasingly being used as a medium to provide counter valuation in ‘hawala’ (informal remittances) transfers, particularly between Dubai and Mumbai.”
The alleged premature release of two questionable parcels is then cited to “ indicate continuing weaknesses in the [Kimberley] process.” A World Diamond Council report (?) was said to quote a local company that “stated that they had in their possession large quantities of African diamonds without Kimberley Process certification.” I find that hard to swallow.

Israel ’s diamond industry fared well in the report. It cited the first reading in the Knesset (Parliament) of a bill that imposes anti-money laundering rules on the diamond sector. The report also states that Israel’s “ Customs Authority continues to intercept unreported diamond shipments, despite the fact that Israel imposes no tariffs on diamond imports.”

Focusing on Lebanese Traders in Africa
The considerable attention the report is giving to diamonds in Lebanon might make one conclude that it is a major diamond trading center. It is not. The U.S. government recalls old information on diamond smuggling from the Congo, simply concluding that it has “serious doubts on Lebanon’s commitment to counter the trade in conflict diamonds.” It then cites the “consistent reports that many Lebanese diamond brokers in Africa are engaged in the laundering of diamonds—the most condensed form of physical wealth in the world.”

While describing the apparent, effective Kimberley Process operations at Beirut International Airport, the report nevertheless laments that all these “safeguards do not address the issue of smuggled diamonds, the purchase of fraudulently obtained Kimberley Process certificates, the laundering of diamonds, or value transfer via the diamond trade.”

“Lebanon has a large expatriate community throughout the Middle East, Africa, and parts of Latin America. They often work as brokers and traders. Many Lebanese ‘import-export’ concerns are found in free trade zones. Many of these Lebanese brokers network via family ties and are involved with underground finance and trade-based money laundering. Informal remittances and value transfer in the form of trade goods add substantially to the remittance flows from expatriates via official banking,” says the report to Congress.

"Expatriate Lebanese brokers are actively involved in the smuggling and laundering of diamonds in Africa. There are also reports that many in the Lebanese expatriate business community willingly or unwillingly give ‘charitable donations’ to representatives of Hezbollah (which is based in Lebanon). The funds are then repatriated or laundered back to Lebanon."


" In G-d We Trust "

Deterrence and Convictions are the Objectives
It isn’t so simple to place all these “findings” about diamonds in a proper perspective. It is clear that there is no other commodity in the world that has voluntarily embraced such a high level of monitoring of the flows of goods and moneys, or has adopted voluntary warranties along the value chain, while the governments in the countries where we operate have legislated dedicated diamond industry anti-money laundering regulations.

There are many factors that are simply beyond the controls of the diamond industry players, especially in Africa. The report signals that there are jurisdictions which are having trouble converting their anti-money laundering policies and programs into investigations, prosecutions, and convictions. “In some cases”, says the report, “the lack of enforcement is due to lack of capacity, but in far too many others it is due to a lack of political will.”
Virtually all diamond dealers in the United States and in the main trading partner countries have some kind of AML/CFT program, do client and supplier due diligence, report suspicious transactions – but, sometimes, this all seems frustratingly irrelevant in the total scheme of things. One of the concerns expressed in the report is that too many jurisdictions are getting caught up in the AML/CTF process and losing sight of the objective.

Financial intelligence is simply the process; the means to an end. Rather, says the report, “the objective continues to be anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism finance convictions. Convictions, combined with asset seizure and forfeiture are the true deterrents, the most meaningful ‘measurable,’ and the bottom line. Far too many jurisdictions continue to fall short in this regard.” This is so true.

With all the criticism and concerns about the diamond industry, one cannot escape the conclusion that the international diamond industry is doing its part. How can we impact the policies of governments such as DRC, Angola, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Russia and other relevant countries? The party that seems to be miserably failing is government, which is the only authority that can deliver indictments, convictions, asset seizures, etc. – but not just overseas.

Let’s look at the United States, the “author” of the report and leader in spearheading the international war against money laundering. As we have noted in last week’s column, New York diamond industry leaders are literally pleading and lobbying government to investigate and bring to justice those involved in one of the industry’s most serious bribing and laundering scandals. When you actually think about this, it is both strange and sad. But it is the way it is.

***

Diamond Imports

Fair Trade Diamonds

Thursday, March 27, 2008

World's Smallest Diamond Ring

This ring of diamond, 300 nanometres thick and 5 micrometres across, was made by carving out a circular structure in an artificially made diamond. It will be used to access single photons, the basis for developing quantum computers (Source: P Olivero, B Fairchild and S Prawer, School of Physics, University of Melbourne)

Scientists have made the world's smallest diamond ring, which could play a role in the future of computing.
At just 5 micrometres across and 300 nanometres thick, the ring is unlikely to fit on anyone's finger, say the Australian researchers who made it.
The University of Melbourne researchers hope the tiny loop will let them manipulate single photons, the smallest 'packet' of light.
They hope the ring, which was carved from a slither of diamond, will help researchers build powerful computers that use the properties of quantum physics.
"For quantum information processing, diamonds have some truly unique possibilities," says Professor Steven Prawer, whose team presented images of the ring at an American Physical Society meeting this month in New Orleans.
Scientists know in theory how quantum computers could take advantage of the rules of physics to carry out enormous numbers of processes at the same time.
But building such a computer in the real world has been an enormous challenge.
Diamonds could overcome some of the obstacles, Prawer says.
That's because they offer an ideal way to produce qubits, the quantum equivalent of the 'bits' that store information on standard computers.
Like normal bits, qubits can have two different values, either 0 or 1. But unlike their standard counterparts, qubits can also exist in a 'superposition' of both states at once.
Diamonds in demand
It turns out that tiny impurities in diamonds meet this criterion, and all the other requirements of qubits, extremely well, Prawer says.
"The diamond offers a fantastic platform in order to make qubits because diamond offers us a gift from nature," he says.
That gift comes about when a single nitrogen atom and a tiny gap disrupt the normal carbon structure of a diamond.
Scientists call these nitrogen-vacancy centres, and by shining laser light onto one, researchers can produce single photons of red light in ways that are easy to manipulate and measure.
They can also do this at room temperature, something most other quantum systems can't do.
The researchers have already used these properties of diamonds in the field of quantum cryptography, which aims to allow secure information to be sent and received using the properties of quantum physics.

Source ABC

Additional Reading : Diamonds are a physicist's—and perhaps quantum computing's—best friend

***

Diamond Imports

Natural Certified Diamonds

www.DiamondImports.com.au


Subscribe in a reader

Rolls-Royce Sports a Diamond Lady

FOREVER: A diamond studded mascot on the front of a Rolls-Royce car on display at the New York International Auto Show last week. (Ram Srinivasan/The Epoch Times)

***

Exclusive creation showcased at NY auto show


NEW YORK—The New York International Auto Show at the Jacob Javits Center features a stunning Rolls-Royce motorcar mascot designed by a Manhattan-based jeweler.
The mascot, known as the Spirit of Ecstasy, sits on every Rolls-Royce coming out of the factory. A one-of-a-kind mascot was commissioned by local luxury car dealership Manhattan Motorcars. Designer Jean Kemanjian described his creation, valued at $200,000, and the design process.
Four inches high by two inches across, the mascot is original to the car. "What inspired me was using the materials we used—the diamonds, platinum, and rare metals. We felt that doing something like this would be a tribute to the car itself."
Diamonds clearly define the work. "It wasn't too hard to come up with an idea to add diamonds to a vehicle," said Kemanjian. "That's never been done before." On such a delicate piece, jewels glow from every fold and indentation. "What we did was to add 150 carats of D color VVS1 quality diamonds and some fancy intense yellow diamonds on the wings."
The skill of the jeweler comes into play at the base. According to Kemanjian, "Pave (pah-vay) is a technique that we use to actually create the surface, which is actually a diamond surface. What you're looking at is actually diamond after diamond. It's like laying down tiles. It's the most expensive surface you can create known to man."
Based on a sculpture of a woman in fluttering robes by Charles Robinson Sykes, the mascot has adorned the hoods of Rolls-Royce motorcars since 1911. The mascot is commonly known as "Silver Lady" or "Flying Lady." (The figure is an interpretation of the 3rd-century B.C. Greek sculpture, the Nike of Samothrace, a Greek symbol of victory.)
Kemanjian stated his diamond-studded mascot is exclusive to Manhattan Motorcars. "This is what Rolls-Royce base their whole emblem on. This goes on every car but without the diamonds. This is the only one in existence,"
Although he designed the prototype for the New York dealership, he is quick to point out that the car itself is all Rolls. "The whole car is original, from top to bottom. This is the original mascot that comes with the car. There's no after market, there's nothing added to the car. This is all original Rolls-Royce."
Kemanjian indicated that everything is done by hand—the polishing, placement—and the designer says these diamonds are really forever. "Diamonds are the hardest surface in the world. They'll never scratch, they'll never rust. This will stay like this for eternity."

Source

***

Diamond Imports

Australia's Leading Diamond Wholesaler


Subscribe in a reader

Diamond Dealers Club of Australia (DDCA) Revitalised


A general meeting for the Diamond Dealers Club of Australia was held Tuesday 25th February 2008.

New elections were held for the positions of chairman, vice chairman and the DDCA committee.

The newly elected chairman is now Mr Rami Baron and his vice chairman is Mr Roy Cohen.

Mr Ian Hadassin, the CEO of the Jewellers Association of Australia has been given an honorary membership with no voting rights as an observer in his capacity representing the JAA which is affiliated with CIBJO, the World Jewellery Confederation.

The DDCA is seeking affiliation, providing they are are accepted, to the World Federation of Diamond Bourses (WFDB ). This will take time and money.

All members of the Australian jewellery industry are invited to join the DDCA.

The benefits of Australian membership to the WFDB will put Australia on the map it is hoped in years to come and hopefully the DDCA will be able to regulate those rogue diamond traders that are presently not abiding by a code of ethics within the Australian jewellery industry.

We believe a new website for the DDCA is imminent.

Diamond Imports congratulates the newly elected committee members of the DDCA and hopes it will have a good future impact on the perception of the diamond jewellery industry in Australia.

It's time to move forward and the feeling is now very positive amongst the DDCA.

***

Diamond Imports
Founding Member DDCA


Subscribe in a reader

The Third International Rough Diamond Conference Overwhelming Success

" Moti Ganz also implored producers to spend 3% of sales turnover on generic advertising of diamonds, saying that this must not be left to a single producer."
***

Israel’s Third International Rough Diamond Conference, held on February 11 and 12, 2008, in Tel Aviv was deemed an overwhelming success, by Eli Avidar, Managing Director of the Israel Diamond Institute Group (IDI) which organized the conference.

“This conference was truly a summit of the rough diamond world. We succeeded in bringing together the leading diamond producer companies, most of the African producing countries, exploration and mining companies and major diamond stakeholders to discuss the challenges facing the industry at a crucial time for the industry,” Avidar said.

Amongst the more than participants were leaders of the world’s major diamond producing companies including De Beers Managing Director Gareth Penny, DTC Managing Director Varda Shine, Alrosa Managing Director Sergei Vybornov, Harry Winston Diamond Corporation President Robert Gannicott, Petra CEO Adonis Pouroulis, Gem Diamonds Managing Director Clifford Elphick, Namdeb Managing Director Inge Zaamwani and Mwana Africa CEO Kalaa Mpinga.

African diamond producing countries were represented by Sierra Leone Vice President Samuel Sam-Sumana, Liberian Minister of Land, Mines and Energy Dr. Eugene Shannon, as well as by senior delegations from Namibia and Botswana

Future sources of rough supply were addressed by Rockwell Diamonds CEO Jeffrey Brenner, Stornoway Diamond Corp. CEO Eira Thomas, Shore Gold Senior Vice President George Read and Stellar Diamonds CEO Karl Smithson.

Also speaking at the conference were Israel Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Industry, Trade and Labor Eli Yishai, Israeli diamantaire Lev Leviev, Director-General of the Diamond Administration of China Li Mu and India’s Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council’s Praveen Shankar Pandya.

Amongst the challenges discussed at the conference were beneficiation, rough diamond shortages, future rough supply, profitability in the diamond pipeline, off-shore manufacturing, the global economic situation and developing diamond markets.

IDI Chairman Moti Ganz, speaking at a session devoted to “Producer Strategies,” disputed claims that there is not enough rough in the pipeline. “There is no shortage of rough. But even more than that – we also have plenty of polished. Manufacturers have accumulated stock in an unprecedented volume of $14 – 17 billion,” he said. Ganz called on producers to refrain from the use of tenders and auctions, which he said hurts manufacturers and the rough producers themselves. Moti Ganz also implored producers to spend 3% of sales turnover on generic advertising of diamonds, saying that this must not be left to a single producer.

The highlight of the conference was a Gala Dinner held at the Tel Aviv Port. In the course of the evening former IDI Chairman Simcha Lustig received a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Israeli Diamond Industry, and was honored with a standing ovation by the audience.

At the dinner the IDI League of Honor was launched with presentation of certificates to representatives of the African governments who attended the conference. Recipients included Sierra Leone Vice President Samuel Sam-Sumana; Namibian Diamond Commissioner Kennedy Hamutenya, who accepted the award for Mines and Energy minister Errki Nghimtina; Liberian Mines Minister Eugene Shannon and Botswana’s Chief Minerals Officer Jongman Mooketsy, for the Botswana Minerals Minister Ponatshego Kedikilwe.

The conference was launched with the reopening of the Harry Oppenheimer Diamond Museum in the Israeli Diamond Industry complex, which had undergone a major renovation, transforming it into the world’s most technologically advanced diamond museum

Source: Israeli Diamond Industry Press Release.

***

Diamond Imports


Subscribe in a reader

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Fancy Shape Diamond Versus Round Brilliant Diamond

Fancy Cut Diamonds



A fancy shape diamond is any diamond that is not a round brilliant cut. They can be referred to simply just as " fancies " or the more uncommon term as " fantasy " cuts.

The shape of a diamond can determine it's price.

As examples:

*Smaller princess cuts in 0.07ct can cost more than round diamonds of the same weight, colour and clarity because small rounds tend to turnover quicker and the depending on the cutter the labour cost is lower. This however does not apply to excellent cut rounds which are being cut now in China by Israeli cutters to compete against the Indian market which has dominated the " smalls " market now for the last fifteen years.

*However a once carat colourless round brilliant may cost 15% to 30% more than a one carat square diamond of the same weight, colour and clarity.

*A one carat coloured round brilliant diamond can cost from 10% to 500% more than a fancy shape of the same weight , colour and clarity and also depending on the mood of the dealer.

The additional labour cost of small fancies is due to specialised skills required to cut them.

Small rounds sell quicker so the profit margin to keep them in stock tends to be less plus it takes less time to cut, measure and select small rounds compared to small fancy shapes.

Prices on rounds usually increase in price from 0.20ct depending on supply and demand and once again on the mood of the dealer. It's easier to compare diamonds of the same shape when pricing diamonds.

This is why Diamond Imports does not offer price match comparisons but rather Visual Diamond Comparisons. Those rogue diamond traders who offer price match comparisons are the ones who rarely carry their own stock and one must always be cautious of being offered a CONFLICT OF INTEREST diamond.

Stocking large round brilliant diamonds can be just as high as large fancy shapes because there are fewer buyers for the larger diamonds but there is a greater demand for the rounds so they tend to cost more than most fancy shapes of the same weight and quality.

Fancy shapes can show a stronger face up colour than round cuts from the same rough.The stronger the colour of the rough diamond the higher the cost of the rough and this is finally translated into the cost of the cut and polished diamond.

Diamond prices can be also affected by how attractive the diamond is.

When judging the shape of a diamond the length to width ratio can be admired or disliked according to personal preferences however if buying a diamond for " investment " we recommend you buy a diamond that conforms to industry standards.

These shapes are sold at premium prices and are difficult to find.

Too much of the original rough could be lost if all diamonds were cut to a standard and besides all buyers have different tastes. It would become boring and comparing would be pointless.

If a piece of rough is elongated the diamond will be cut in such a way to maximise the beauty of the diamond but maximising the weight from the natural rough.

Non traditional shapes can be purchased for a lower price per carat.

Deciding what shape is best for you can be determined as follows:

1) Your personal preference.

2) Brilliance & Sparkle

3) Weight

4) Size appearance. Please click on weight to millimetre size ratio link below

If a women says " Size does not count " don't trust her. Trust us...It does ! Everybody wants their diamond to look bigger than it's actual weight. This is the biggest advantage of fancy shapes over round brilliants.

Always consider the weight to millimetre size ratio.

Fancy shapes tend to look bigger than round diamonds of equal weight.

5) Shape of of your hand.

Always try a few shapes to see which looks best on your hand.

6) Colour & Clarity

Round diamonds mask internal flaws and colour best. The step cut Emerald cuts and baguettes can not hide inclusions. This means a lower quality will be a lower price.

7) Availability

8) Pleasure and/or investment

9) More unique and individual designs. Fancy shapes lend to more distinctive styles.

We hope this will help you realise the importance making VISUAL DIAMOND COMPARISONS not like those desperate feeble price match comparisons offered by inexperienced diamond vendors who have no feeling for the business they are in.

If you wish to buy a diamond based on price alone rather than visually examing the differences between similar diamonds we suggest you do not buy anything because the chances are that the cheaper diamond will not be as beautiful.

This will help you judge values more accurately without making your diamond a sterile commodity that drop shippers and some online diamond vendors with no creativity or understanding of diamonds tend to do.

Hoooroooo from De Guru

Daniel F Katz GG

***

Diamond Imports


Subscribe in a reader



Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Historical Feature 1997 : Are Ideal-cut diamonds really ideal?

"It's a good marketing term, but you won't hear me use it," he said. "It gives the impression that everything else is not ideal."

One thorny issue on the four C's is the CUT. While the three C's are very straight forward to understand, the evaluation of CUT is an area of no uniform agreement.

Many stores in the area promote what is called "Ideal-Cut" diamond and charge very premium price on them. Are they really better than other cuts ? If they are, reputable diamond grading lab should be able to grade CUTs just as in color and clarity. But as we are well aware, there is no standard grading on CUTs.�

GIA has been doing extensive research on this subject for a number of years... And the following news clipping is statements made by the president of the GIA , Mr. William Boyajian in the fall of 1997 as appeared on the National Jewelers on page 14 of November 16th issue.
***

GIA's President Bill Boyajian recent article on Cut Grading

In reference to articles and correspondence in recent issues about the dilemma of proportion grading the Towkowsky model alone.

I would like to offer the following thoughts.

Conclusions about cut cannot and must not be drawn from individual measurements any more than the outcome of a football game can be drawn from any one play.

Moreover, GIA's three dimensional computer ray tracing research to date indicates a multiplicity of proportion options yielding significantly beautiful stones - certainly no less beautiful than a Towkowsky proportioned round brilliant- that in many cases are more attractive to many eyes.

One example discovered in our investigation of modeling proportions of a round brilliant cut diamond revealed that, by our method of calculating brilliance, a 59 percent table is more brilliant than a 53 percent table, which was defined by Towkowsky as "ideal" This calculation was based on maintaining all other angles defined by Towkowsky.

Perhaps more important, it appears that brilliancy alone can also be affected by the interrelationship between different sets of angles from the crown and the pavilion. Even if the diamond the smaller table happens to show more fire, we question the sensibility of dictating to consumers that a diamond with a larger appearance and more brilliance is worth less than one with more fire.

The results of our preliminary research are currently in preparation for publishing in our quarterly journal, Gems and Gemology.

This leads to a second thought regarding the reporting of cut on diamond grading reports and the use of optically sophisticated equipment in that process.

It is a further trap for the trade to adopt measurement parameters that are altogether too strict in their reporting.

Anyone can print out a host of dimensions from todays noncontact optical measuring devices and appear to be doing the public a great service.

While anyone rushes to be the first to carve a niche in the marketplace for diamond grading and cut analysis, we caution trades people to avoid embracing unproven standards that may create a public backlash rather than a diamond boon.

It took decades of extensive research using high technology to bring the industry to a more modern and scientific understanding of proportion considerations in a round brilliant cut diamond.

While I doubt that it will take as long to further our knowledge of cut, I fear that the premature use of information without a thorough understanding of its scientific basis and practical implications is a bubble waiting to burst.

WILLIAM E. BOYAJIAN
PRESIDENT
GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
1997
***
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GIA: Ideal Stones Not Most Brilliant

Carlbad, Calif.-----New research shows that there are other cuts with more brilliance than ideal cut diamonds, Gemological Institute of America President William E. Boyajian told NATIONAL JEWELER.

"No question about it: An ideal cut stone is a beautiful diamond." Boyajian said, "But it's a matter of taste. There are thousands of variations that can lead to an equally beautiful diamond."
For that reason, he also took issue with the label ideal.
"It's a good marketing term, but you won't hear me use it," he said. "It gives the impression that everything else is not ideal."
The study's findings on the famed ideal cut ---invented by mathematician Marcel Tolkowsky in 1919 ---are part of a major GIA project researching diamond cut, that will be published in a Gems and Gemology article next year.
George Kaplan, vice chairman of Lazare Kaplan, a New York ideak cutter, siad "there has never been any disagreement" that other stones are more brilliant than ideals.
"We believe it is the most pleasing combination of brilliance and fire," he said. "What it does is give the ideal combination between the two."
Peter Yantzer, director of the American Gem Society's lab, which gives ideal cuts its highest cut grade of "zero," said that "If it were scientifically proven that there are other cuts that are up to the ideal, we would certainly have our standards committee look into that."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
***
Diamond Imports

New Mothers are Material Girls at Heart.

The Judgment of Solomon by Raphael

Two new mothers approach Solomon, bringing with them a single baby boy. Each mother presents the same story - she and the other woman live together. One night, soon after the birth of their respective children, the other woman woke to find that she had smothered her own baby in her sleep. In anguish and jealousy, she took her dead son and exchanged it with the other's child. The following morning, the woman discovered the dead baby, and soon realised that it was not her own son, but the other woman's. After some deliberation, King Solomon calls for a sword to be brought before him. He declares that there is only one fair solution: the live son must be split in two, each woman receiving half of the child. Upon hearing this terrible verdict, the boy's true mother cries out, "Please, My Lord, give her the live child - do not kill him!" However, the liar, in her bitter jealousy, exclaims, "It shall be neither mine nor yours - divide it!"


Raffaello Santi, known as Raphael, or Raphael of Urbino, was born in Urbino on Good Friday 6 April 1483, the son of Magia di Battista di Nicola Ciarla and Giovanni Santi di Pietro. His father was a painter and poet at the court of Frederico da Montefeltre, one of the most famous princes and art patrons of Early Renaissance Italy.

***

New mums demanding diamonds as compensation for pregnancy

London, Mar 23: It's raining extravagant gifts for new mums, all thanks to their American husbands, who're following the film star trend of presenting their better halves with expensive presents after they give birth, says a new research.

Also, according to the study, American mums are increasingly demanding more material compensation for pregnancy and labour: diamonds, other jewellery, or an expensive holiday.

The study revealed that Americans are incited by the examples of Hollywood stars such as Pierce Brosnan who gave his wife Keely three gold and diamond bracelets when their son Paris was born. He also gave her a two-week trip to Bora Bora in Tahiti, a post-pregnancy holiday known as a "babymoon" and likely to have cost up to 100,000 pounds.

Matthew Broderick gave Sarah Jessica Parker a gold charm bracelet.

But Ben Affleck's wife Jennifer Garner told him after giving birth to return the jewellery he had bought for her because it was too expensive.
[ Ben Affleck seems to have a track record for returning unwanted jewellery gifts : The Diamond Guru ]

Such a trend has been encouraged by a growing range of gifts designed especially for such occasions, reports the Telegraph.

Due to which the motherhood industry has given birth to the concept of "push presents" - so-called both because they are a reward for the act of giving birth, and because mothers are pushing their husbands to dig deep into their wallets.

Fathers now not only have to make it to the delivery room on time, but had better come brandishing more than a bunch of flowers.

A survey by the parenthood website BabyCenter.com found that almost four out of 10 new mothers received "push presents".

An even larger number, 55 per cent, said that they expected them - so presumably some had been disappointed.American companies are trying to ensure they don't miss out.

The elite jeweller Tiffany offers celebration rings for new mothers at 2,300 dollars, featuring pink sapphires and diamonds for a girl and blue sapphires and diamonds for a boy.

Numerous websites have set up online gift registries.

One jewellery company, Hearts on Fire, has a "motherhood" collection that allows women to send a "drop a hint" email to their husbands.


***
Diamond Imports


Subscribe in a reader

Monday, March 24, 2008

Celebrity Engagement Rings


From antique rings to customized creations, there is as much variation among celebrity engagement rings as there is between brides. One of the most common attributes of a celebrity ring, however, is the exceptional carat size: these larger than life personalities often sport larger than life engagement rings.

Elizabeth Taylor, when engaged to her third husband, Michael Todd, wore a nearly 30-carat emerald cut diamond.

Lady Diana Spencer wore an 18-carat deep blue oval sapphire circled by fourteen diamonds when she promised to become Princess Diana.

Catherine Zeta-Jones’ nuptial promise to Michael Douglas was sealed with a 10-carat antique horizontal set marquise diamond.

Despite the eventual cancellation, Jennifer Lopez’s finger sparkled with a 6-carat radiant shaped pink diamond while she was engaged to Ben Affleck, a stone reported to cost more than $3 million.

Paris Hilton’s short-lived engagement was highlighted by the 24-carat emerald cut diamond ring.

Donald Trump presented his bride-to-be Melanie Knauss with an overwhelming 12-carat emerald cut engagement ring reported to cost a cool $1 million.

Not all celebrities prefer weighty rings, however. Many have chosen elaborate styles and settings over larger stones.

Queen Elizabeth’s classic 3-carat diamond is set in platinum with five smaller stones.

After Marilyn Monroe eloped with Joe DiMaggio, he presented her with a platinum eternity band set with thirty-six small baguette diamonds.

Jackie Kennedy was given a modest 3-carat emerald set with nearly three additional carats of diamond accents when she accepted John F. Kennedy’s proposal.

Jessica Simpson’s 4-carat engagement ring was an unusual pear-shape set in platinum with two side stones.

Katie Holmes' 5-carat ring from Tom Cruise is a classic oval shape in a pave setting.

Reese Witherspoon’s 4.5 carat Asscher cut engagement ring is set in a stunning 1920s art deco style.

Camilla Parker Bowles wed Prince Charles with an emerald ring accented by baguettes on each side, set delicately in platinum with an art deco style.

Star Jones opted for a stunning princess cut diamond as a prelude to her lavish million-dollar wedding.

Madonna’s 5-carat total weight ring is a three stone design with bezel settings.

***

Diamond Imports

Celebrate with a Diamond


Subscribe in a reader

Sunday, March 23, 2008

The Retailers Guide to Marketing Diamond Jewellery.


The Retailers Guide to Marketing Diamond Jewellery.

The CIBJO Marketing and Education Commission is supporting jewellery retailers by providing them with the tools to compete with the best of the luxury world. We have created The Retailers Guide to Marketing Diamond Jewellery as the first step. While the guide focuses on marketing diamond jewellery, the principles outlined are applicable across all forms of jewellery.

The Retailers Guide to Marketing Diamond Jewellery will provide you with a comprehensive guide on how you can get the most success in marketing your business.

The guide:
*Provides practical and applicable ideas that will assist you in marketing your jewellery store
*Provides detailed case studies detailing the practices of other jewellery retailers
*Provides and demonstrates effective business tools to develop you business

It is comprised of four modules:
Your Business Planning for the future success of your business
Your Customer Gaining an in-depth understanding your customers
Your Team Driving excellence through your team
Your Marketing Effectively increasing awareness and driving traffic to your store

The complete guide has been constructed in PDF format. This allows you to click on the headings on the contents page or throughout the document to go to the selected subject. At the bottom of every page there is a Back to Contents link.

To make it easy to get the information that you want from the guide, you can download the whole guide, just the business tools and case studies or each module individually.

Click here to download The Retailers Guide to Marketing Diamond Jewellery in its entirety.

Click here for the business tools PDF

1.Your Business

Demonstrates the planning and practices that you need to put in place to prepare yourself to effectively market and promote your business.

Click here to download module 1: Your Business

2.Your Customer

Assists you in understanding your customer and explains how to sell more effectively.

Click here to download module 2: Your Customer

3.Your Team

Addresses the key area of training and developing your sales team to ensure that they represent your store well and provide the highest level of service to you customers

Click here to download module 3: Your Team

4.Your Marketing

Looks at how you can drive customers to your store through branding, public relations, merchandising and advertising.

Click Here to download module 4: Your Marketing

With information sourced from The Diamond Trading Company & Courtesy of CIBJO


***

Diamond Imports

Independently Certified Diamonds

Avoid In-House Diamond Certificates

&

Conflict of Interest Diamonds

Diamond Education


Subscribe in a reader

Historical Feature: What does HPHT really stand for?

The Diamond Alchemist ?

By Virginia Halevi - THURSDAY, JANUARY 15TH, 2004

***

Changing the color of diamonds. Is it a process? Is it a treatment? Should it be considered a legitimate part of diamond manufacturing like irradiation, surface coating or fracture drilling? Or, should it be outlawed? Despised, reviled, thrown out of the industry into the murky world of the illegitimate. Just what does it mean to change the color of a diamond? What does HPHT really stand for? Should we care? Should the consumer? Will it destroy consumer confidence? Can it and will it harm the diamond industry? Or, at the moment, is there just a lot of talk and over-reaction about a process that, in one way or another, has been around since the mid-1940s?


Some of the answers we already know, but for most, only time will tell. What is certain though, is that 2004 is opening with a lot of confusion, concern and contradiction over what really is an HPHT diamond. The story of these chameleonic diamonds dates back some 60 years or so when the first commercial treatment for changing a diamond’s color began. It wasn’t the High-Pressure, High-Temperature (HPHT) process that is being used today, but it had the same effect - it improved the diamond’s color. This process though involved exposing the gems to radiation, which was somewhat of an unstable action. It did though break through some barriers. The industry at the time realized the potential of such a process and flags were waved. Horrified, trade leaders quickly gathered together to discuss what they assumed would be the devastating impending damage this could have on consumer confidence. At the same time, in the somewhat calmer atmosphere of the gem laboratories, researchers sat behind their microscopes and other gem paraphernalia to study the properties and traits of these treated stones. In fact, these radiated diamonds of the 40s gave rise to the GIA’s issuance of ‘origin of color’ reports.

Turning the clock forward half a century or so, the industry is still calling for urgent meetings to discuss color changing treatment on diamonds. The gem researchers are still locked behind their microscopes and equipment, examining and dissecting the properties of treated stones and consumers, are still, seemingly either unaware or uninterested in the whole story. In fact, it’s not only consumers, but many jewelry manufacturers and retailers are in the dark when it comes to shedding light on what an HPHT-treated diamond is. It is, after all, a natural diamond, so what makes this process different to any other manufacturing process? This is where all the controversy begins.

In the mid-nineties, Lazare Kaplan International (LKI) and General Electric (GE) submitted a number of diamonds to several gem labs for certification. No red flags were hoisted; the labs did their work and returned the diamonds with certifications. It was then that LKI/GE informed the labs that hey, these weren’t just any diamonds. These stones were some of the guinea pigs of a new technological process that they had developed - a process that improves the color and sometimes even the clarity of specific diamonds. According to LKI/GE there was no cause for concern, they urged the labs and the industry to accept this new process as merely an additional step in the traditional methods used in diamond polishing. In fact, when they first began the marketing of their treated stones they stated that the process ‘simply provides comparable conditions of heat and pressure allowing these crystals to spontaneously relieve themselves of their molecular street and return to the proper alignment and their original colorless state.’ It was, they said, purely ‘a process of restoration’, even coining the phrase that these HPHT diamonds were ‘The diamond nature intended’. Others in the industry took somewhat of a different view to this slant on the process. “No other process changes the physical properties of a diamond,” notes an executive of the World Federation of Diamond Bourses. (WFDB).

In late November 2003, representatives from the major gemological labs and industry organizations gathered at the New York Diamond Dealers Club to debate this thorny issue. While at present Lazare Kaplan’s/GE Bellataire line is the only official line of HPHT diamonds on the market, there has been an increase, especially over the past six months, of a greater number of treated diamonds on the market. Officially all HPHT diamonds when sold by dealers must be disclosed as having undergone treatment, but increasingly there are cases of HPHT diamonds submitted for grading without prior disclosure. It was the issue of how the gemological labs certify these, as well as prior disclosed HPHT diamonds, that would prove to be the overwhelming point of debate throughout the day’s talks.

Sitting around the large conference table on the 11th floor of the DDC, were representatives of most of the major gem labs, GIA, IGI, EGL, HRD and AGS, all of whom were in unanimous agreement about one thing, consumer confidence must be protected at any cost. Missing from the melee though was a presence from Lazare Kaplan/GE. It wasn’t that they’d boycotted the meeting, more that the meeting had boycotted them. Despite several phone calls to the DDC, Lazare Kaplan was very politely given the cold shoulder. “This is an industry meeting,” noted the conference’s coordinator, President of the DDC, Jacob Banda. “We are here to represent the interests of the whole diamond community, not just one particular company.” It’s a pity though that this one particular company wasn’t in attendance, after all who knows more about the process, disclosure and marketing of a treatment than the people who created it.

According to Tom Moses of the GIA, it was some six years ago, back in 1997, that the GIA first identified an HPHT stone. It wasn’t though by any means the first time a treated stone had been submitted for certification. At the time General Electric informed the GIA that it had some 1,000 grading reports from a variety of gem labs, which did not pick-up on the fact that the diamonds submitted had undergone this treatment. It was then that the flags were raised and the bugles played and the gem armies put on red alert. LKI/GE very quickly returned the 1,000 stones and their reports to the GIA to enable the GIA to further examine the stones. Eventually the stones were returned with a cert stating that they had been HPHT treated.

Since then the GIA has identified some 15,000 HPHT treated stones, which has allowed the lab to build a significant research database on the properties and characteristics of a stone that has undergone this color altering treatment. But, on top of the 15,000 there are a percentage of stones that leave the lab with a certificate that states the stone is ‘undetermined’. ‘Undetermined’ is the euphemism used for stones that according to the lab's examination might or may not have been HPHT treated. For the owners of such stones this is not a satisfactory result. If a dealer has bought a stone that is a ‘natural’ untreated stone, yet shares certain physical traits in common with treated stones, their diamond is tainted with a question mark. Some labs will even hold a stone for up to six months in a quest to fully determine whether it is or isn’t HPHT. Unfortunately though a final answer isn’t always forthcoming. “We don’t foresee a situation at present, in which we will be able to identify 100% of HPHT diamonds,” warned Moses.

On the other hand the HRD laboratory is ‘quite confident on their detection of HPHT stones’. “But,” continued HRD’s Peter Borgmans, “there remains a small percentage of stones which we flag as undetermined.” The IGI are even more certain, actually they state they have ‘absolute confidence that all colorless diamonds, which have been HPHT treated are detected when submitted to the IGI for grading’. Turning to another lab, the AGS, they are more in line with the opinion of the GIA. There are cases, they say, where they simply cannot be 100 percent positive if the stone has been treated or not. Unlike the GIA, the AGS simply returns the diamond with a certificate stating the stone is a Type Ia or Type IIa. “This raises a flag for the client,” explains AGS’ Peter Yantzer. “They are now aware that the stone is of the type possible for HPHT treatment.”

So, we know what the labs do when they suspect a stone has undergone the treatment but, to calm nerves and protect consumer confidence, is this enough? Most definitely not,” emphatically states WFDB’s Meir Wertheim. “Dealers are worried that a sizeable portion of HPHT treated diamond escape detection. Not all the gem labs have the equipment to detect the process. On top of this, each lab operates independently and at present there are no uniform regulations implemented by all labs.”

Over in the U.K., there is another army - these are the soldiers of the Gem Defensive Battalion, with their base in the De Beer’s research center in Maidenhead, England. These gem defenders have been working for several years on the development of relatively inexpensive, quick and easy to use screening instruments. In 1996, they came up with the DiamondSureTM and then the DiamondSure 2 - machines that not only separate natural from synthetic diamond, but also explicitly identifies Type II diamonds. At the end of the month, De Beers announced that it would make such technology available to organizations that requested it.

And so it came time to really address the issues relating to HPHT. The process is here to stay. However much some would like the treatment to be outlawed, the machines thrown into a garbage dump and HPHT to disappear from the diamond industry forever, that isn’t going to happen. Only now, are some waking up to the fact that it’s time to deal with issue, implement regulations and enforce transparency. For this, there needs to be unanimous consensus throughout the industry organizations and gemological laboratories

First off, all in New York agreed after several hours of debate that gemological labs must have some form of nomenclature on a lab's report over what precisely is HPHT. Some referred to HPHT on their certificates as a stone that has undergone HPHT treatment to 'improve' its color. Others describe the process as 'altering' the color of a stone. 'Improved' or 'enhanced' were considered to be too ambiguous, with terminology such as 'modified' 'altered' or 'changed' preferred as describing the effect the process has on the color (and in some cases clarity) of the diamond. “If each lab describes HPHT differently, how can a consumer understand what HPHT is?” asked Mark Gershburg of EGL.

But, it will take a bit more than wording to help ensure full disclosure of all HPHT stones being traded on the market. At present, all the labs, bar the AGS, will only certify a HPHT stone (disclosed as such on their grading certificate) if the stone is laser-inscribed on the girdle as HPHT. If, they say, the client refuses the lab permission to laser-inscribe the stone, then they return the diamond without certification. However, for many present at the meeting this was not guarantee enough.

One participant even called for the labs to hold all HPHT stones if the owners do not agree for the diamond to be laser-inscribed on the girdle as HPHT. The labs and other delegates quickly shot down this idea, but it just highlights how concerned many in the diamond industry are over the impact that non-disclosed HPHT diamonds may have on consumer confidence. “The GIA offers full disclosure, but it does not pass judgment on a product and a process,” rebutted Moses. Agreeing with this take Jerry Ehrenwald from IGI noted, “labs aren’t police and as yet there is no law regarding obligatory laser-inscription on HPHT treated stones.”

However, the WFDB stepped in and agreed to issue a recommendation that all HPHT stones that are graded by laboratories will be laser-inscribed HPHT. This sounds good in practice, but in reality, can a lab inscribe a diamond without the owner’s permission, or even contrary to the owner’s permission. Does this mean then that the diamond will be returned without a certificate and without laser-inscription? And, will all labs, not just the ones present in New York agree to this?

So, we know stones that undergo HPHT have to be Type Ia or IIa diamonds and, more often than not, the clarity of the stone has to be VS or above. Stones of a lower clarity are highly susceptible to breakage during the process. “If the clarity is not high, it is reasonable to assume the stone won’t have been HPHT’d,” explains Moses. But, once again as technology improves, so does its capabilities. Moses followed on this statement noting that the GIA has recently seen an increase in lower clarity diamonds that have been HPHT treated. In fact, the type and number of diamonds being treated is expanding, smaller sizes and lower clarities and subsets of colorless can also be targeted as suitable for HPHT. According to the HRD, some 10 carater pluses are now being HPHT treated.

There have also been instances in which HPHT treated stones undergo a secondary treatment to hide that fact that they are HPHT. According to the HRD who reported this alarming trend, such deception isn’t working, with the lab saying that they still detect the stone, just that it is harder to make a 100% determination that that stone is HPHT. “But,” insists Borgman, “such stones are flagged as questionable. They don’t escaped detection.” But, how can we really know what percentage of HPHT diamonds escapes detection? At the moment, we can’t.

What is a Type Ia diamond or Type IIa? Type I diamond account for some 95% of the world’s diamond production. A Type Ia (a subject of Type I) is a stone in which nitrogen atoms are present in pairs or groups. Type IIa are very rare, they account for only 2 percent of the global diamond supply

Type IIa classification is given to diamonds that are chemically very pure - containing nearly undetectable amounts of nitrogen. Type IIa are usually brown in color, but occasionally they are produced as colorless. If they contain boron then they will appear with a blue to gray hue.

***

October 15, 2001 From Gems & Gemology: Update on Blue and Pink HPHT-Annealed Diamonds

Recently, Bellataire Diamonds submitted one blue and two pink high pressure/high temperature (HPHT) processed diamonds to the GIA Gem Trade Laboratory. Matthew Hall and Tom Moses of the East Coast Gem Trade Lab provide this brief follow-up to the Fall 2000 G&G Lab Note on pink and blue HPHT-processed diamonds.
The 7.54 ct pear shape (see photo) and the 4.57 ct emerald cut had colors equivalent to Fancy purplish pink and Fancy Deep brownish pink, respectively. The 0.73 ct marquise cut was equivalent to Intense blue. The gemological properties (color zoning, reaction to UV radiation, etc.) of these diamonds overlapped those of their natural-color counterparts. Both pink diamonds were type IIa (i.e., they contained a nominal amount of nitrogen), and the blue diamond was type IIb (i.e., it exhibited boron-related absorption peaks in the infrared, and was electrically conductive). However, close examination of the 7.54 ct pear shape revealed an etched and pitted surface on a pavilion facet, which was probably the result of the high temperature procedure used to enhance its color.
Low-temperature photoluminescence (PL) spectra were obtained from each of these diamonds with a Raman microspectrometer. On the basis of our own criteria and data from the literature, we were able to differentiate the spectra of these diamonds from those in our collection of more than 800 low-temperature PL spectra of natural-color pink and blue diamonds. These results further confirmed the usefulness of low-temperature photoluminescence in the identification of color-enhanced diamonds
***
Read More Here
*

***

By now if you have not figured it out then do not buy a diamond.

Save your money and go on a nice holiday instead.

You'll thank me and don't forget to send me a postcard.

Hooooroooo from De Guru

Diamond Imports

Halle Berry Diamonds Are Forever Ad Campaign




***
The Guru says, " Hubba Hubba "
*
Diamond Imports
*

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Pink Diamonds: Ellendale Diamond Field

This pink diamonds weighs 1.63 carats and costs USD $325,000.
Pink diamonds are probably most desired diamonds in woman's world but because of their rarity they're extremely expensive and really affordable only to rich people.
Pink diamonds are diamonds you'll have trouble find in many jewelry stores and once you find them don't be surprised if their price pushes you away from their beauty.
Number of pink diamonds in nature is decreasing day by day, increasing their price up to astronomic level.
This is the reason why many deprived customers decide on buying alternative to pink diamonds in form of pink sapphires, but they're not sparkling as pink diamonds, not to mention their different color since pink diamonds are usually pale pink and pink sapphires have much darker pink color.
But with enough money you can choose from variety of pink diamonds, as they're available in many different shapes and sizes.
Their combination with white diamonds looks fantastic and many customers choose this combination since it's significantly cheaper than the one of pink diamonds only.
Despite their high price pink diamonds are selling almost the same moment they found their way in jewelry stores so buying them isn't a simple task, regardless of your financial power.
But once you find them, you'll became the proud owner of these amazingly beautiful and rare diamonds.
***

Technical, gemmological and scientific information on Pink Diamonds in Australia is usually not available.

We find this document to be of important future historical significance in years to come as a reference

In particular we find the cause of colouration of pink diamonds still a point of interest that requires further investigation.

Daniel F Katz GG

***
IN THE PINK: ARGYLE'S DIAMOND GIFT TO AUSTRALIA
Alex Bevan, Peter Downes
Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences
Western Australian Museum


ABSTRACT
Through the generosity of Argyle Diamonds, an important part of Australia’s rich mineral heritage will be preserved in perpetuity in an Australian public institution for the benefit of future generations. In a great gift to the nation, in 2003, Argyle donated several hundred pink diamonds to the mineralogical collection of the Western Australian Museum. This generous donation comprises twenty-eight parcels of faceted pink and other coloured stones from the Argyle (AKI) Mine in the Kimberley region of Western Australia. The collection represents the largest of its kind in any public m in Australia. Part of the sponsorship agreement between Argyle and the Western Australian Museum is that the stones be placed on permanent display. Moreover, other institutions throughout, Australia may apply to the Western Australian Museum to borrow material for temporary exhibition subject to appropriate insurance and security arrangements. In this way Argyle's bequest, representing a unique display resource, can at some time be enjoyed by all Australians.
Introduction
Argyle Diamonds mine, on average, around 30 million carats of diamonds per year from the AKI pipe in the East Kimberley region of Western Australia. The recovery represents about a quarter of the world's current total diamond production. Today, rough diamonds are sold directly to the world market by Rio Tinto Diamonds, acting as agents for Argyle Diamonds in Antwerp, Belgium.
Only about 5 per cent of the recovered diamonds from the AKI pipe are of gem quality, with a further 70 per cent classified as near gem. All of these stones are destined for the jewellery market, and diamonds ranging in colour from white (colourless), through champagne and cognac (yellow to brown diamonds), to the rare pinks are sold by the company. Pink diamonds are not unique to the Argyle Mine since they have been recovered in small amounts from deposits in other countries, such as South Africa, India, Brazil and Indonesia. However, Western Australia has become the primary source of pink diamonds for the world's markets.
Not-with-standing, less than 0.1 per cent of the total diamond extraction in Australia consists of pink diamonds. Because of the small number of diamonds of this colour available, they are in strong demand by the international diamond market and currently command very high prices. For this reason they make a significant contribution to Argyle’s polished sales revenue. Although prices vary depending on current markets, past sales indicate that intensely coloured pink diamonds are commonly sold for more than A$150,000 per carat, and sometimes very much greater.
Western Australian pink diamonds have stimulated many levels of interest. On an historical level, the discovery of diamonds in the Kimberleys in the 1970's marked a new era of exploration and research (not to mention wealth) in Australia. Moreover, because most of the diamonds were found in lamproites (an unusual rock type), the discovery caused a re-examination of diamond exploration in Australia, and around the world. On a cultural level, Argyle pink diamonds are something of an icon for the Australian community. Many would aspire to own one, others would be satisfied just to view one occasionally. On a scientific level, the rarity of natural pink diamonds makes them interesting targets for research. Research into the colouring agents, such as impurities and structural defects (colour centres), of diamonds continues. Finally, from a geological point of view, the complexity of the paragenesis of Argyle diamonds in the AK1 pipe has undoubtedly contributed to the wide range of coloured stones from this locality.
Herein lies a conflict, however, for the undoubted significance (historical, cultural, and scientific) of pink diamonds to Australia was, until recently, in stark contrast to the number of cut pink stones that were exhibited permanently in Australia's public cultural institutions. Prior to Argyle's donation, there was only one single cut pink diamond (of 0.30 ct), on display in an Australian public institution (Australian Museum in Sydney). The South Australian Museum in Adelaide exhibits a single, uncut pink diamond (1.50 ct), from the Bow River deposit in Western Australia, generously donated to them by Normandy Mining. And while there may be pink diamonds in private collections, or held for investment purposes in Australia, these remain invisible to the general community.
Australian pink diamonds are a limited resource. When the mining operations in the Kimberley eventually cease, this magnificent representative suite of unusual natural objects will still be preserved for posterity in a public collection in this country. Argyle's donation ensures that these items of cultural and scientific interest are protected, and remain accessible to the wider Australian community.
DISCOVERY
Although alluvial diamonds were first found as early as 1851 on the Macquarie River near Bathurst, New South Wales, the discovery of commercial diamonds from a primary source in Australia is relatively recent. While there was an early discovery of alluvial diamonds at Nullagine in the Pilbara of Western Australia, by gold prospectors in 1895 (Groom, 1896; Simpson, 1951), systematic exploration of that area did not begin in earnest until 1965. In 1967, attention focused on the West Kimberley region where the geological setting and previous work elsewhere in the world had suggested good exploration prospects (Clifford, 1966; Deakin et al., 1989). Lamproites in the West Kimberley were first studied in the 1930’s and their relationship to kimberlites was recognised (Wade & Prider, 1940). Until the 1960’s, kimberlites were thought to be the only primary source of diamonds at the surface of the Earth; however Prider (1960) suggested the possibility that lamproite may also be diamond-bearing.
Fig. 1. Map of the Kimberley region of Western Australia showing the main geological structures, the three major diamond provinces, and the occurrences of lamproite and kimberlite pipes.
Early exploration by a number of companies in the Ellendale and Noonkanbah areas of the West Kimberley (Fig. 1) failed to locate diamonds. However, in 1969, following the discovery of a few alluvial diamonds along the Lennard River, in the West Kimberley, a consortium of companies then known as the Kalumburu Joint Venture (later the Ashton Joint Venture) began a systematic search for diamonds in this area. In 1976, CRA Exploration joined the Ashton Joint Venture as a major stakeholder. Shortly after, the company announced the discovery of diamonds and lamproite near Ellendale in the West Kimberley (Fig. 1).
Although the focus of diamond exploration remained in the West Kimberley, in the late 1970's the Ashton Joint Venture also sought diamonds, and the indicator minerals of potentially diamond-bearing rocks, in the stream gravels of the East Kimberley. In August 1979, after more than ten years of exploration in the Kimberley region by many companies, diamonds were found in stream gravels collected from Smoke Creek in the East Kimberley (Fig. 1). Further samples indicated that the upper part of the creek was a commercially viable alluvial diamond deposit. Moreover, these alluvial diamonds persisted for 20 km upstream to their source. On the 2nd of October 1979, the Argyle (AK1) lamproite pipe was discovered at the head of Smoke Creek, in the Matsu Range. Following further sampling, in 1980, a deposit of alluvial diamonds was found at Limestone Creek around 25 km from the AK1 pipe. This creek drained the area south of the AKI pipe and flowed south east towards the man-made Lake Argyle (Grice & Boxer, 1990; Shigley et al., 2001 and references therein). The so-called Bow River Project, a joint venture between Gem Exploration and Minerals, and Freeport-MeMoran, began production from the alluvial deposits of Limestone Creek in 1988.
ABORIGINAL HERITAGE
The Argyle lease occupies the traditional land owned by the Gidja and Mirriuwung speaking people and neighbouring language groups, which have a presence dating back many thousands of years. Argyle has a strong, open and respectful relationship with each Aboriginal group.
The relationship with local Aboriginal groups extends to both agreements and arrangements that assist in providing a future for local families and communities, education and training initiatives, and employment and business opportunities. Argyle considers local traditional knowledge to be most significant, and it is frequently incorporated into the business including, for example, cultural heritage site management, a unique ethno-botany study, and a range of community relations projects.
Argyle foresees a legacy where local communities reflect on the mine as a real and practical cornerstone of sustainable development, having due regard for the environment, improved social wellbeing and generated economic prosperity.
GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND HOST ROCK
The Kimberley region of Western Australia comprises two main geological structures. A central basin consists of approximately flat-lying sediments and volcanics, 5 km thick, that were deposited between 19-1.6 billion years ago. The nature and age of the rocks beneath the Kimberley Basin have been the subject of considerable debate. This is because evidence of them comes from a small number of xenoliths in volcanic rocks, and indirect isotopic and geophysical techniques. Several authors have suggested that the Kimberley Basin is underlain by a stable Archaean Craton of igneous and metamorphic rocks with ages >2.5 billion years (Gellatly, 1971; Graham et al., 1999). Plumb& Gemuts (1976), however, suggested that the Kimberley Basin was floored by rocks of the Halls Creek Group that are of Proterozoic age. This has been supported by more recent work indicating that the shallow basement is probably a Proterozoic granite terrain (Gunn & Meixner, 1998). The central Kimberley Basin is flanked along its south eastern margin by the Halls Creek Mobile Zone (East Kimberleys), and to the south west by the King Leopold Mobile Zone (West Kimberleys) (Fig. 1). These may be the remnants of a Proterozoic collision between the Kimberley Block and the rest of northern Australia. Both the Halls Creek and King Leopold Mobile Zones contain metasediments and metavolcanics of Palaeoproterozoic age, and the late Palaeoproterozoic intrusives and metamorphic rocks of the Lamboo Complex.
In all, three main diamond provinces have been found to date. The North Kimberley Province occurs east of Kalumburu (Fig. 1) in the Kimberley Basin. Here diamond-bearing kimberlites have been found in a typical cratonic setting. The other primary diamond occurrences (West Kimberley Diamond Province and East Kimberley Diamond Province) are in, or near,the mobile zones and almost exclusively in diamond-bearing lamproite pipes, although kimberlitic dykes in the East Kimberley also contain some diamonds (Jaques et al., 1986). These intrusions occur along zones of faulting and extension.
The Argyle AK1 olivine lamproite pipe occurs about 120 km south-south west of Kununurra in the East Kimberley. Geologically, the pipe lies about 7 kms west of the Halls Creek Fault, marking the eastern boundary of the Halls Creek Mobile Zone (Boxer et al., 1989). In the Halls Creek Mobile Zone the crystalline basement rocks are highly deformed by folding and faulting. These are superimposed in the north by northerly dipping sedimentary and volcanic rocks that were deposited 1.5 billion to 500 million years ago. The Argyle pipe intruded the older of these rocks about 1.1- 1.2 billion years ago along a pre-existing fault (Pidgeon et al., 1989). Considering its
great age, the AKI pipe is remarkably well preserved and the upper levels of what was once an active volcano can be observed today. The reason for this preservation is that resistant outcrops of the rocks into which the pipe was intruded have protected it from erosion. However, it may have been buried and exhumed over the vast expanse of time since its emplacement.
Prior to the discoveries in the Kimberley, diamonds had been found elsewhere in the world in kimberlite pipes. Both kimberlite and lamproite are igneous rocks of deep-seated origin belonging to the alkaline ultrarnafic suite (rocks rich in potassium and/or sodium, and low in silica). Kimberlites and lamproites have compositional and mineralogical differences that are probably related to variations in their depth of origin, and the degree of melting and the composition of the rocks that melted to produce them. Generally, lamproites (Fig. 2) are richer in silicon, titanium, potassium and phosphorus than kimberlite.
Fig, 2. Typical diamond-bearing olivine lamproite from Argyle's AKI Mine, East Kimberley (field of view approximately 2cm).
Thus lamproites are often rich in potassium silicates, including leucite, phlogopite, potassic richterite and sanidine, but also may contain forsteritic olivine and diopside. In contrast, kimberlites are rich in volatiles, or dissolved gases, with a high contentOf CO2, and a mineral assemblage that includes olivine with monticellite, phlogopite, perovskite, spinel, apatite, carbonate and/or serpentine. Not all kimberlites and larnproites are diamond-bearing. Indeed, diamond-bearing pipes are the exception rather than the rule, and of the lamproites in the Kimberley it is the olivine lamproites, not the leucite-bearing lamproites that contain economic quantities of diamond.
The emplacement of diamond-bearing rocks in Australia has occurred sporadically from 2000 to about 20 million years ago, with lamproites being the main diamond carriers (Jaques et al., 1986). The Proterozoic Argyle pipe, erupted about 1180 million years ago, is the richest, and since then, weathering and erosion has distributed some of its diamonds into local economic alluvial deposits (Smoke Creek, Limestone Creek & Bow Creek deposits).
The Argyle lamproite carried up two generations of diamonds from the mantle. These diamonds formed at temperatures of between 1000 and 1500 ºC (Jaques et al.,1989; Jaques et al., 1990), and at depths of 150-180 km. One generation of diamonds might have formed as far back as the Archaean. However, the majority of the Argyle diamonds formed around 1580 million years ago (Richardson, 1986), including the brown diamonds, which were stored for up to 400 million years, at temperatures around 1260'C, before transport to the surface (Taylor et al., 1990).
COLOUR AND COLOURING AGENTS
The cause of colouration in pink (and other) diamonds is enigmatic and continues to be the subject of scientific research (e.g. see Chapman & Humble, 1991; Chapman et al., 1996; Chapman & Noble, 1999; King et al., 2002, and references therein). In the absence of evidence that colouration is due to some trace element contents of the pink diamonds (such as nitrogen or boron), currently it is thought that the cause of the colouration is similar to that producing brown colouration in diamonds. Essentially, colour is determined at the atomic level by lattice defects (colour centres) that can selectively absorb light in the visible region of the spectrum (Collins, 1982, and references therein).
In some pink diamonds colouration is unevenly distributed, occurring most intensely along bands parallel to octahedral {111} planes in the cubic structure. This has been interpreted (Collins, 1982) as having resulted from deformation of crystals during their geological history in the host rocks. Essentially, carbon atoms along the planes of stress are displaced along slip planes producing colour centres, although the structure of these is poorly known.
More recently, Chapman & Noble (1999) have studied colouration in pink and rare blue Argyle diamonds. Their research, using Electron Spin Resonance, Fourier-transfonn infrared spectroscopy, photo-luminescence and other techniques has revealed that pink colouration may be related to charge states in colour centres, and could involve nickel (Ni-) impurities in association with nitrogen (N+) defects.
For pink diamonds, Argyle recognises four main colour categories: pink (P), purplish pink (PP), brownish pink (BP) and pink 'champagne' (PC). These broad categories are graded further according to the intensity of their colour from 'very intense' (1) to 'very faint' (8), and on the basis of the diamonds clarity.
THE ARGYLE DIAMOND DISPLAY COLLECTION
The diamond collection donated to the Western Australian Museum consists of twenty-eight parcels containing more than 500 individual stones weighing 13.73 ct in total (Fig. 3). Four are rough pink diamonds (octahedral crystals) of different hues. Several hundred of the stones are Argyle's stock 'pink melee diamonds', each no more than a few points in weight from strongly coloured to faint pink diamonds. For comparison, two are white diamonds and two are champagne coloured diamonds at either end of the intensity scale (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. The complete Argyle Diamond display collection held at the Western Australian Museum.
Twelve stones (12) are large pink diamonds of different hues. These range in individual weight from 0.16 to 0.58 ct and have been cut in a variety of shapes including brilliant, oval, marquise, emerald and triangular. The colours of the diamonds vary from light or pale pink to purplish pink. A few of the stones are brownish pink, and two are pink champagne in colour. The largest diamond is an intense brownish pink, pear-shaped diamond containing an inclusion, (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Five of the largest pink diamonds in the Argyle Diamonds display collection at the Western Australian Museum. The largest (centre) weighs 0.58 ct.
The current total market value of the stones is more than $A200,000, although their actual value as a collection of pink and comparative diamonds far exceeds the sum of their individual parts.
SUMMARY
The Argyle Pink Diamond Collection, currently housed at the Western Australian Museum in Perth, is an exceptional gift to the nation, and represents an outstanding gernmological/geological display resource. It is hoped that over years of exhibition many Australians will view the collection (or part of it), and it will also be enjoyed by numerous visitors from overseas. The primary role of public Museums is to preserve collections in perpetuity for the benefit of future generations. Long after the Argyle Mine has closed, this collection will be enjoyed by future generations of Australians.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank Ken McNamara (Western Australian Museum), Robyn Ellison (Argyle Diamonds), and Jennifer Bevan (University of Western Australia) for reading, criticising and greatly improving an earlier version of the manuscript. Figure I was drafted by Danielle West, and the photographs were taken by Geoff Deacon.
References
Boxer G.L., Lorenz V. and Smith C.B. (1989) The geology and volcanology of the Argyle (AKI) lamproite diatreme, Western Australia, In J. Ross and others, Eds., Proceedings of the 4h International Kimberlite Conference, Perth, 1986 Kimberlites and related rocks vol. 1. Their composition, occurrence origin and emplacement, Geological Society of Australia Special Publication no. 14, 140-169.
Chapman J., Brown G. and Sechos, W. (1996) The typical gemmological characteristics of Argyle diamonds. Australian Gemmologist. 19, 339-346.
Chapman J. and Humble P. (1991) The cause of colour in Argyle pink and champagne diamonds. In A.S, Keller Ed. Proceedings of the International Gemological Symposium, GIA, Santa Monica, 1991, 159-160.
Chapman J. and Noble C.J. (1999) Studies of the pink and blue coloration in Argyle diamonds. Gems & Gemology. 35(3),156-157.
Clifford, T. N. (1966) Tectono-metallogenic units and metallogenic provinces of Africa. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 1, 421-434.
Collins A.T. (1982) Colour centers in diamond. Journal of Gemmology. 18(l), 37-75.
Deakin A. S., Boxer, G. L., Meakins A.E., Haebig, A. E and Lew J. H. (1989) Geology of the Argyle alluvial diamond deposits. In J. Ross and others, Eds., Proceedings of the Fourth International Kimberlite Conference - Kimberlites and related rocks, vol.2, Their mantle/crust setting, Diamond and diamond exploration, Perth, 1986, Geological Society of Australia Special Publication No. 14, 1108-1116.
Gellatly D.C. (1971) Possible Archaean rocks of the Kimberley region, Western Australia, Geological Society of Australia Special Publication no.3, 93-101.
Graham S., Lambert D.D., Shee S.H., Smith C.B. and Reeves S. (1999) Re-Os isotopic evidence for Archaean lithospheric mantle beneath the Kimberley Block, Western Australia. Geology. 27(5), 431-434.
Grice, J.D. and Boxer G.L. (1990) Diamonds from Kimberley, Western Australia. The Mineralogical Record. 21, 559-564.
Groom F.F. (1896) Report of a visit to Nullagine, Pilbara District, to examine the country reported to be diamond yielding. Western Australia Department of Mines, Annual Report 1895, 27.
Gunn P. J. and Meixner A. J. (1998) The nature of the basement to the Kimberley Block, Northwestern Australia. Exploration Geophysics. 29, 506-511.
Jaques A.L., Hall A.E., Sheraton J.D., Smith C.B., Sun S.S., Drew R.M., Foudoulis C. and Ellingsen K. (1989) Composition of crystalline inclusions and C-isotopic composition of Argyle and Ellendale diamonds. Geological Society of Australia Special Publication. 14, 966-989.
Jaques A.L., O'Neill H.StC., Smith C.B., Moon J. and Chappell B.W. (1990)
Diamondiferous peridotite xenoliths from the Argyle (AKI) lamproite pipe,
Western Australia. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. 104, 255-276
Jaques A.L., Lewis J.D., and Smith C.B. (1986) The Kimberlites and Lamproites of Western Australia. Geological Survey of Western Australia, Bulletin 132, 268pp.
King J.M., Shigley J.E., Guhin S.S., Gelb T.H. and Hall M. (2002) Characterization an grading of natural-color pink diamonds, Gems & Gemology. 38(2), 128-147.
Pidgeon R.T., Smith C.B. and Fanning C.M. (1989) Kimberlite and lamproite emplacement ages in Western Australia, In J. Ross and others, Eds., Proceedings of the 0' International Kimberlite Conference, Perth, 1986 - Kimberlites and Related rocks vol. 1, Their Composition, Occurrence, Origin and Emplacement, Geological Society of Australia Special Publication no. 14, 369-381.
Plumb K.A. and Gemuts 1. (1976) Precambrian geology of the Kimberley region, Western Australia, 25th International Geological Congress, Sydney, Excursion Guide 44C, 69 pp.
Prider R.T. (1960) The leucite-lamproites of the Fitzroy Basin, Western Australia. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia. 6(2), 71-120.
Richardson S.H. (1986) Latter-day origin of diamonds of eclogite paragenesis. Nature. 322, 623-626.
Shigley J.E., Chapman J., and Ellison, R.K. (2001) Discovery and Mining of the Argyle Diamond Deposit, Australia. Gems & Gemology. 37, 26-41.
Simpson E.S. (1948-52) Minerals of Western Australia, 3 vols, Perth Government Printer.
Taylor W.R., Jaques A.L. and Ridd M. (1990) Nitrogen-defect aggregation characteristics of some Australian diamonds: Time-temperature constraints on the source regions of pipe and alluvial diamonds. American Mineralogist. 75, 1290-1310.
Wade A and Prider R.T. (1940) The leucite-bearing rocks of the West Kimberley area, Western Australia. Quarterly Journal Geological Society of London. 96, 39-98.
Address for correspondence:
Dr Alex Bevan
Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences
Western Australian Museum
Francis Street
Perth WA 6000
email: bevana @museurn.wa.gov.au


Source has pictures

***
Diamond Imports


Subscribe in a reader

CIBJO Releases Special Reports Ahead of Dubai Meeting

The Dubai International

MILAN, ITALY: March 21, 2008 - CIBJO released three more special reports compiled by the group's Diamond Commission, the CIBJO Marketing and Education Commission, and the CIBJO Gemmological Commission.

Diamond Commission

In its report, the authors of the CIBJO Diamond Commission (CDC) express their hope that in Dubai, it can resolve some of the 'hot' issues that were the cause of friction at earlier CIBJO congresses.

One of the issues the CDC hopes to finally get out of the way is that of the nomenclature of synthetic diamonds. While the CDC does not intend to compromise on the need for full disclosure of the origin and character of synthetic diamonds, it will propose that the terms "man-made," "laboratory created," or "[company name]-created" be deemed equally acceptable when these diamonds are traded.


The CDC also intends to discuss standards for diamond grading labs and intends to invite a member of the Gemmological Commission onto its steering commission to discuss standards needed for diamond grading labs. It also plans to liaise intensively with the International Diamond Council (IDC) on these issues.

Marketing and Education Commission
In Dubai, CIBJO's Marketing and Education Commission will offer a preview of its latest publication - The Retailer's Guide to Understanding Diamonds, Gemstones, Pearls and Precious Metals.

The guide will provide jewellery retailers with a basic understanding of the fundamental elements of diamonds, gemstones, pearls and precious metals; a series of practical "Key Facts" guides which can be distributed at retail level to empower staff; and a wholly balanced view with contributions from all CIBJO commissions - an exciting collaborative opportunity for the Marketing & Education Commission.

Gemmological Commission

Since the CIBJO Congress that was held in March 2007 in Cape Town, South Africa, the CIBJO Gemmological Commission has been busy fine-tuning an application form for gemmological laboratories that are interested in being listed by CIBJO.The guidelines for the application document were discussed, drafted and approved during the 2006 CIBJO Congress in Vancouver, Canada. The resulting document, which consists of 10 articles, was named the " CIBJO Chart for Laboratories ".

" The Commission members said that they were hopeful that by the time the 2008 CIBJO Congress in Dubai comes around, they can report that CIBJO's endeavour to create an authorised CIBJO List of Gemmological Laboratories is in full swing.

For more information about the upcoming 2008 CIBJO Congress in Dubai (April 14-16), and for registration purposes, please visit the CIBJO website. http://www.cibjonews.com/


Source: CIBJO Press Release
***

CIBJO's Diamond Book


International Diamond Trade Organisations

Diamond Imports


Subscribe in a reader

Diamond Certification Proves Theft


Ex-guard who stole diamonds getting 5 years, divorce

A jewelry store security guard turned diamond thief is between a rock and a hard place

He'll be doing five years in prison, a Henrico County judge said this week, and he's undergoing divorce proceedings.

To make matters worse, Edward S. Goodman will go without the Chinese food that he spent much of his ill-gotten gains to consume.

"He seemed to have a fondness for Hunan," said a person close to the investigation of Goodman's thievery, which dates to 2006.

But for Adolf Jewelers owner Ronnie Adolf, Goodman's demise has left a far more empty feeling in his wallet than the empty feeling in Goodman's stomach.

In court proceedings, investigators placed Adolf's loss at almost $600,000.

"It was absolute betrayal, a betrayal of all of us," said Adolf, whose store is at 1537 N. Parham Road in the Ridge Shopping Center.

"This was a man whose arrest had customers sending us sympathy cards, they were so shocked. His mother used to send us breakfast in the mornings. We were all here together every day. It was one big family."

* * * *

Goodman, 42, was sentenced Thursday on embezzlement, larceny and computer-fraud convictions, all linked to his diamond heists.

Goodman's girth and Fu Manchu mustache made him a familiar figure to jewelry store customers, many of whom stopped by, Adolf said, "just to chat with him."

But for reasons still unclear, Goodman began swiping diamonds. He erased his pilferage from security tapes and even managed to erase computer records of legitimate sales.

"We trusted him like family and he stole my password," Adolf said. "We couldn't figure what was happening, where the profits were going. Was it the economy? Competition? It turned out it was Edward. The profits were going to him."

Goodman, who lived in New Kent County and had worked for Adolf for 12 years, apparently tried to start a gun-sales business with some of his money, but that went belly-up.

"Things were so bad he was borrowing money from me at the same time he was stealing," Adolf said.

* * * *

R.L. Egan, a Henrico investigator who worked the case, said Goodman swiped as many as 100 diamonds, only 15 of which were recovered.

That left Adolf Jewelers with a $593,000 loss, which a court this week ordered Goodman to repay. Adolf said he had insurance but that it did not cover the total loss.

Many diamonds were sold on eBay, where Goodman used the name "lawdragster," Egan said.

But Goodman made the error of listing certification numbers so he could assure each diamond's authenticity.

"He also refused to drop his price, which gave him a lot of legitimacy with buyers," Egan said.

The certification numbers showed the diamonds were from Adolf. Case closed.

A SWAT team arrested the unsuspecting Goodman at work in June.

Adolf said Goodman never apologized. He pleaded no contest to the embezzlement and other charges in December and was sent to jail without bond.

Divorce papers delivered to him in jail list his arrest date as the day he deserted his family.

And after he serves his time in prison, Goodman will be on probation. For life

Source:Friday 21st March 2008

***

Diamond Imports

Graff Sells 70 Carat Diamond for USD$11 Million

High-end jeweler Laurence Graff sold a 70.12 carats yellow diamond for USD$11 million (EUR 7 million) over the weekend, the company said.

Sample picture of a fancy yellow emerald cut diamond

The sale was made to an undisclosed European buyer at the Tefaf arts & antiques fair in Maastricht, Netherlands on Saturday.

The stone valued at USD$156,874 per carat.

A spokesperson for Graff described the diamond as an emerald cut fancy intense yellow diamond weighing 70.12 carats set in platinum ring with two white diamonds weighing 1.8 carats.

Graff''s managing director, Francois Graff, said the sale was a reflection of investor preference for real assets at the moment.

"There's a lot of fear in the financial markets at the moment. We're seeing a flight to real assets," he said in an email.
Source: Avi Krawitz Rapaport 17th March 2008

***

Diamond Imports

Fancy Coloured Diamonds


Subscribe in a reader

Friday, March 21, 2008

Certifigate: Rallying Support for Closure Certifigate 7

Amid all of the emotions and sensitivity of the Gemological Institute of America’s (GIA) Certifigate scandal it is occasionally worthwhile to take stock of the state of affairs and to reflect on where we are now and, most importantly, where we are going. Should it be the objective to bring to justice a large part of my list of 25 bribers and several bribe recipients? Do we want the GIA as a certification institution to collapse and match Enron, Arthur Anderson, and WorldCom in the speed of its demise?

Or do we want all want to work jointly and tirelessly to restore the GIA’s standing as the integrity standard of diamond paper? Do we want a worldwide recall of all GIA certificates of one carat and above issued prior to 1995? Should we be concerned about the consumer finding out or should we become proactive in informing consumers? Where is it all heading?

These are important questions. It is my guess that if one would conduct an opinion poll in the diamond industry, the large majority of the players would probably prefer that we stop writing about the subject so that it could simply be forgotten. These include people who are struggling in a difficult market and have been greatly hurt by the scandal but who just want to move forward and make a living. Then there are some mid-size and mega-companies throughout the value chain that have greatly benefited (and have grown enormously) and, therefore, would also prefer to keep a low profile on the scandal and to just let it pass. The pressure to have justice done comes from a small but rapidly growing group of people to whom ethics, decency and justice mean a lot.

The reason we recently put it so clearly back on our agenda was mostly because of the reports that U.S. Federal Attorney Harry Chernoff has closed the file. I’m not the only one that believes so. We should not forget for a second that the Certifigate scandal covers a wide range of fraud, corruption, bribery, and forgery. We are talking about serious offenses. Whoever recognizes these basic elements has the answer to where we are heading: criminal matters must be dealt with and resolved in a court of law. It is just that simple.

There is an unfounded feeling in the market that the U.S. Federal Attorney Chernoff seems softer on the bribe-recipients than on the bribers. That public perception may be the result of the repeated statements by the GIA that it is fully cooperating with the U.S. Attorney’s office on a continuing basis, passing loads of information to it. In all fairness, that is the way every involved or affected party ought to act; one must cooperate with law enforcement. If all parties that have hard information or evidence on the misconduct had shared it with the U.S. Department of Justice, there might have been no need today for urging the government to expedite the investigation.

One has to be careful not to develop conspiracy theories. We must assume that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office know how to conduct a criminal investigation and, most assuredly, that they do not take direction or advice from the GIA as to what investigative steps they should or should not take. We must assume that if the U.S. Attorney’s Office determines there is sufficient evidence to bring an indictment, it will take the necessary steps to do so; if sufficient evidence is lacking, it will not. Nevertheless, there are too many unanswered questions.

For instance, one of the “certified bribers” moved abroad. Why was there never an extradition request? It is, however, most telling that some 10 months ago he moved back to New York, apparently not at all worried that he might be arrested or face trial. It is his return to New York that has given added impetus to the belief that the U.S. Attorney has closed the files.

Industry Leaders Voice Concern
Ronnie Friedman, the president of the Diamond Manufacturers and Importers Association of America (DMIA), really gave the right answer to the above-mentioned questions at the organization’s annual meeting earlier this week. He expressed frustration at the slow pace of the wheels of justice. His displeasure with the U.S. Attorney’s office may be best demonstrated by his public announcement that the DMIA has been writing letters to the higher-ups in the U.S. Justice Department, such as Chernoff’s boss, Michael J. Garcia, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.

“We are concerned that the investigation of this affair by your office may have been prioritized by other investigations,” wrote Friedman to Garcia. “If that is indeed the case, we hope this letter will impress upon you the significant harm to our industry which has resulted from the alleged criminal misconduct. In our role of responsible leadership for our industry, we strongly encourage the prosecutions of any and all criminal wrongdoing. In simple terms, if members of our industry have engaged in criminal acts such as bribery, fraud, etc., it is imperative that they be exposed and prosecuted for profiting from illegal conduct and prevented from continuing to destroy the image and reputation of our industry and our product,” wrote Friedman.

We have reasons to believe that other trade and industry leaders will also become more vocal on this issue in the months ahead – and that is a welcome development.

All of the publicity and public appeals for action will not result in a possible loss of public confidence in diamonds and the diamond industry. No, to the contrary. Loss of public confidence will come about as the result of the lack of action by law enforcement officials. U.S. Attorneys on all levels, including the U.S. Attorney General in Washington, must recognize that if they don’t issue indictments in Certifigate the resulting turmoil in the diamond jewelry market will be enormous. In light of the abundance of evidence of wrongdoings, the option of no prosecution should not exist.

In recent weeks, I have disclosed many isolated examples of Certifigate wrongdoings to highlight and illustrate how the scam operated in practice. More examples will follow in future publications. This week, through journalistic investigative channels, I have been able to satisfyingly verify that virtually each incident I have reported so far was also discovered by GIA’s internal investigator Tom O’Neil quite some time ago. I’ve also been able to ascertain that all of my examples had already been forwarded by the GIA to the U.S. Attorney’s office. So details on our “case studies” are on Chernoff’s desk. Whether he followed up on them is a different matter – many of those initials mentioned should have had visits from FBI agents, to say the least.

It remains exceedingly troubling that the U.S. Attorney is perceived as sitting on his laurels and allowing some of the evidence to become useless while the statute of limitations runs out. Friedman was courageous in singling out the visible lack of progress of the U.S. Attorney’s office (which he has visited) as presenting a serious predicament for the entire industry.

The GIA’s Investigation
Through many interviews, I have become more aware of the width and scope of GIA O’Neil’s internal investigation. He thoroughly questioned key players including the organization’s ex-president Bill Boyajian, ex-vice president Tom Yonelunas, and also existing key executives including Tom Moses, Donna Baker and Ralph Destino. O’Neil reports directly to the GIA’s Board of Governors and has a mandate to do and investigate anything he pleases. And the results of the investigation have been passed to the U.S. Attorney.

I admit that I am among those who have expressed doubts about what – if anything – the GIA had passed on to the authorities. However, as an investigative journalist in an ongoing and evolving story, I owe it to myself and to readers to keep an open mind and to change previously expressed positions or views whenever the facts warrant it. Wherever these facts take us.
Any failure by the GIA to present all the facts that it has discovered would make it subject to obstruction of justice charges. It only makes common sense that the Board of Governors will not allow this to happen. In response to our views that the GIA should be the U.S. Attorney’s main target, as its name and logo are on the questionable certificates, GIA President Donna Baker commented that the “GIA cooperated fully and completely with the criminal investigation so that it would NOT become a target itself. If the government had reason to believe GIA's cooperation was less than complete or candid, our status would indeed become that of target.” We must give the GIA a lot of credit and respect for being the only involved party in the scandal that is truly and fully cooperating with the authorities. We have anecdotal evidence of diamond dealers which went to the authorities to tell them about wrongdoings they were aware of – but when asked to sign an affidavit to this effect they were not willing to do so. In contrast, the GIA has been literally going extra miles to bring the information the U.S. attorney.

However, cooperating with the U.S. Justice Department isn’t the same as cleaning up house. On that score we believe there are still serious shortcomings. [ There are those in the market that tell us that some of the old practices are still taking place today. We are investigating, following up leads, and for the time being, we have not seen firm evidence of any continued wrongdoing.]

The Complexity of Evidence
One should not underestimate the complexity of building a legal case that would lead to convictions. My (limited) understanding of the U.S. justice system is such that a prosecutor will hesitate to go to court if he doesn’t have comfort that he’ll win and get convictions. One of the main reasons that it is so difficult to substantiate some of the charges in the Certifigate scandal is that in many cases the right grade was obtained fraudulently. In the books of the GIA, it is hard to trace those instances – one must show that money passed hands, the bribery, the laundering.


Allow me an example that took place in 1999. A very honorable and respectable diamond dealer had a 20-carat stone on which he got a D-VVSI. The diamantaire believed that the stone was a D Flawless, and he argued with the GIA for almost two years – to no avail. Then, through a middle man, he was advised to reduce two points of the stone after which the diamond was submitted a member of the community of bribers [identity is known to this writer.]. The stone then got a D Flawless within days. Also, the make was moved from “Very Good” to “Excellent.”
The exercise cost the diamantaire close to $30,000 and he ended up getting the grade he had deserved to begin with. [This case has also been discovered by GIA investigator O’Neil and passed on to the prosecutor.] What the government needs is proof on how this money passed and to whom, something which might move the focus of the government’s case to an all-out money laundering investigation.

I’d like to differentiate between aspects of Certifigate that affect the consumer (such as upgrades or deficient certificates that fraudulently omit information such as HPHT or fluorescence) and issues of traders being defrauded by their peers in cahoots with some bribe-recipients at the GIA. We have seen examples of trade-partnerships in large stones that first got the grades they rightfully deserved. Then one partner bought out the others -- and subsequently got himself an upgrade. His honest co-partners in the stone lost out.

We also have examples of people who were out of favor with certain GIA graders and who believe they were intentionally downgraded. We are also aware of GIA graders “tipping off” outside parties by telling them that Mr. So-and-So has submitted such-and-such stone. The graders would tell the outside parties to go and buy that stone and then get a better grade.
We have seen evidence where brokers would show a stone to a potential client, who would note the number on the certificate and would then find out from an inside GIA source who had submitted that stone. This would enable the potential client to purchase the stone directly from its owners and bypass the broker. Or, how about the scenario in which HPHT diamonds were not checked for this treatment – is that “an accident” or intentional omission? Federal agents must be able to judge a variety of different suspicious scenarios.

Certifigate and the Patriot Act
Some major rough suppliers and other players in the diamond industry have various codes of ethics or best practice principals. These companies can move the benchmarks of their standards any time they please. And they do. But they may have lost sight of the fact that the regulatory landscape has changed since 9/11. But no company is above the law.

The U.S. Patriot Act and FinCEN’s Jewelry Rules, UK anti-money laundering legislation, the FATF standards, and European Community law all clearly state that bribery and forgery are predicate money laundering offenses. These are serious criminal offenses in virtually every jurisdiction where rough suppliers and their clients operate.

The laws which govern the diamond business in New York and elsewhere require dealers and suppliers to conduct adequate AML/CFT due diligence of trading partners; require the reporting of suspicious transactions; and prohibit one to accept moneys that were derived from illegal activities (i.e. any payment for rough by fraudulent client). Moreover, anyone’s non-performance in following the laws may make one unwittingly a corroborator to money laundering. The laws don’t require anyone to have legal proof. The mere presence of suspicions is enough for one to take actions.

In this very confusing Certifigate situation, one should be guided by law. Members in the diamond community who actually do a serious due diligence on their trading partners in accordance with the applicable AML/CFT regulations are violating the law if they knowingly deal with companies or individuals suspected of money laundering and bribery. The mandatory AML/CFT program of diamond merchants requires dealers to “develop procedures for identifying transactions involving potentiality illegal activity, and procedures setting forth actions that a dealer will take in a response to such transactions.”

FinCEN’s Jewelry Rules allow the diamond dealer considerable discretion in determining “whether a transaction should be refused or terminated” which “must be based on the facts and circumstances relating to the transaction and the dealer's knowledge of the customer or supplier question.”

The publication (by GIA or others) of the names of the suspected bribers may leave any industry player – including upstream suppliers and downstream jewelry chains – with an implied obligation to sever business ties with these companies.

As so much anecdotal information has become available in recent years – including a court case – and in the absence of a clear determination by the U.S. Attorney, those who wish to play it safe should also view Certifigate through the lenses of their own internal AML/CFT programs.

The spate of the recent articles on Certifigate have contributed to an industry-wide wake-up call, or, more precisely, to the awareness that the industry cannot remain complacent on the issue. Referring once again to Ronnie Friedman’s call to U.S. Attorney Garcia: it reflects the industry’s overriding need for “closure” – to end these lingering uncertainties and to restore tranquility to the trade. His plea deserves the widest possible industry support and the heads of other trade organizations should go on record and publicly endorse these views.

Pleaded Friedman to Garcia: “If your office’s investigation of this matter is currently ongoing, we implore you and the members of your staff as well as other law enforcement agencies, to devote your full time and attention to bringing this investigation to an expeditious conclusion. If any member of our industry is found by you to have been actively involved in criminal conduct, you may be assured that we will welcome news of their indictment, arrest and prosecution for said conduct.”

THURSDAY, MARCH 20TH, 2008, CHAIM EVEN-ZOHAR
*


***
Are GIA's Gem Trade Laboratory's
diamond grading reports
a time bomb waiting to happen ?
*
" Name the GIA Bribers ! "


Diamond Imports

In light of the GIA bribery scandal ," Certifigate " , and our strong support of Chaim Even-Zohar's revelations Diamond Imports refuse to stock ANY NEW GIA graded diamonds offered to us both for ethical reasons and many inaccurate diamond colour and clarity grades.
*
Likewise anyone dealing in GIA graded diamonds is NOT someone we wish to deal with until GIA’s Gem Trade Laboratory decides to disclose the bribers' names and comes clean in order to inadvertently avoid dealing with a GIA briber.
*
In Australia, Diamond Imports endorses the Diamond Certification Laboratory of Australia because they are triple A rated
Accurate Accredited Australian
*

GIA " Integrity " Versus DCLA Accuracy

GIA Sycophants ?
or
OZY ! OZY ! OZY ! OY ! OY ! VEY !

GIA Gem Trade Laboratory ?

or

Who would

you trust?




GIA " The Internet Certificate " for Drop Shippers.

INTEGRITY ?
In light of the GIA bribery scandal ," Certifigate " , and our strong support of Chaim Even-Zohar's revelations we refuse to stock ANY NEW GIA graded diamonds offered to us both for ethical reasons and many inaccurate diamond colour and clarity grades.
*
Likewise anyone dealing in GIA graded diamonds is NOT someone we wish to deal with until GIA’s Gem Trade Laboratory decides to disclose the bribers' names and comes clean in order to inadvertently avoid dealing with a GIA briber.

*

Diamond vendors can not be absolved of any wrong doing hiding behind a diamond grading report recognised or unrecognised.
*
They have both a moral and ethical duty of care to their clients.
*
GIA is NOT an IDC diamond grading laboratory.The DCLA is one of only five laboratories worldwide recognised as an International Diamond Council (IDC) laboratory. The IDC is the governing body established by the (WFDB) World Federation of Diamond Bourses and The International Diamond Manufactures Association (IDMA). These two bodies are the worlds highest Authorities in Diamonds.
*
The GIA's colour grading standards are simply not as strict and Diamond Imports is not prepared to jeopardise their reputation unlike other diamond vendors who sell any diamond just for the sake of closing a sale.
Despite any colour grades that may be given due a bribe we have constantly noticed that GIA are on average one colour below the DCLA standard of the Australian CIBJO master set which starts at a low "D" colour. In other words a GIA "D"colour tends to be on most occassions a DCLA "E" colour.
The difference between these two colours could translate into thousands of dollars difference and in our opinion is sanctioning grade bumping.
DCLA is the official CIBJO laboratory for Australia and holds the official registered National Diamond Masterset for Australia.
*
With the advent of the ever growing internet diamond retail market the concept of drop shipping has become prevalent.
*
Drop shipping has enabled websites to give the appearance of a fully stocked retail business without the costs, overheads, knowledge or experience associated with running a business.
*
Drop shipping has opened the door for many new dealers, markets and also scams.
*
A lot of these drop shippers advertise GIA graded diamonds that are not in stock and do so to add false credibility to their websites.
*
Hence now why GIA grading reports are now being referred as the Internet Certificate , a common report for the most ordinary diamond vendors marketing to the most mediocre clients.
*
The only difference is professional diamantaires do NOT trust GIA reports, carry real stock and show the greatest respect to those diamond buyers who have done their own research prior to purchasing their chosen diamond.
*
Diamond Imports has a duty of care to their clients and if GIA's is living off their past reputation we no longer trust GIA's integrity until the disclosure of the names of the GIA bribers.
*
Read The Real Truth about GIA diamond grading reports here.
*
BUYERS BEWARE
Verify your GIA graded diamond has been
accurately graded prior to purchase.
In Australia we recommend the DCLA
verify all diamond grading reports as a precaution.
BEWARE
In-House certificates, Manufacturers' Grading Reports
and Jewellery Appraisals are usually presented
by unethical rogue traders as protection.
Verify prior to purchase.

***

Ask yourself why would an
Australian diamond vendor promote
a corrupt foreign
diamond grading report ?
~~~
How GIA Grades Diamonds: The Real Truth
~~~

Diamond Imports

Proudly Australian



Subscribe in a reader

Men Own the Engagement Ring

Diamond Imports

Highest Quality Certified Diamonds


Court rules women must return engagement rings
A court has ruled that engagement rings are conditional gifts that belong to whoever shelled out the money


When wedding plans turn sour, unwilling brides should resist any urge to toss out the engagement ring, the NSW Supreme Court has determined.


The court today dismissed an appeal by Vicky Papathanasopoulos against an earlier decision that had ordered her to compensate ex-fiance Andrew Vacopoulos AUD$15,250 for the value of a discarded engagement ring.

Ms Papathanasopoulos had appealed on the grounds that after she called off the wedding and tried to give back the ring, Mr Vacopoulos had told her she could keep it.

A few days later, Ms Papathanasopoulos told her father to dispose of the ring, along with photographs and other mementos of the failed relationship, which he threw in the garbage.

Mr Vacopoulos subsequently found out the ring had been disposed of, prompting him to launch legal action in a Manly court for compensation.

In a written judgment, Justice Rex Smart said in the eyes of the law Ms Papathanasopoulos was holding her ex-fiance's property.

"I do not accept (the) contention that once (Mr Vacopoulos) ... left the engagement ring on the table it became her property to keep or dispose of as she wished," Justice Smart said.

The court found that if a woman refuses without legal justification to marry her fiance she cannot keep and must return any engagement ring.

By turning down the offer of marriage, Ms Papathanasopoulos had rejected the "conditional gift" of the ring, the court found.

"Upon ... rejecting the gift she became a bailee of that item (the ring) so long as she had it in her control," Mr Smart said.

"It is not open to a bailee to cause the item bailed to be thrown into the garbage bin.
Holding a small item, such as an engagement ring, is not a great chore
."

He rejected the claim that when Mr Vacopoulos told his ex-fiancee she could keep the ring it became an "absolute gift", as there was evidence it was said in a bid to salvage the relationship.
by Simon Kirby May 18, 2007



***

Diamond Imports



Subscribe in a reader

The $12 Million Dollar, 150 Carat Diamond Wedding Dress


Jeweler Martin Katz and dressmaker Renee Strauss teamed up to create the most expensive wedding dress on record, featuring a stunning 150 carats worth of diamonds laced throughout the dress.

The veil that is shown in the picture worn with the dress does sparkle, but it does not feature diamonds. Instead, the veil has some pretty rhinestones. But we figure, if you’re doing to drop $12 million on a dress, why not just have someone custom create a matching, diamond-laced veil?

And while you’re at it, get some fancy diamond-studded shoes to add to the bling factor!


The dress hasn’t yet been sold, so if you’ve got your eye on it (as well as the $12 mil), Strauss and Katz would be more than willing to discuss a sale. Unlike other wedding dresses, this one will still have a high resale value after the wedding.

Source


***
Diamond Imports


Subscribe in a reader

Lee Simmons Wants Diamond From Dog's Ashes

Hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons’ ex-wife Kimora Lee Simmons wants to honor her late dog by turning the pet’s remains into a diamond.

The Baby Phat model and fashion designer is in mourning after 18-year-old bitch Zoe’s recent death.

But she is contemplating celebrating Zoe’s life with a new piece of jewellery.

She tells People.com, "You have to… grieve. It’s okay to take time and say this meant something to my life and (to) honour it.

"There is a company that makes diamonds out of your loved ones. They make diamonds from a little of the carbon from the ash, so I might do that. I might turn her into a diamond."
Source

Hooooroooo from De Guru
Happy Easter Everyone

***

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Sierra Leone: Who Owns The Country's Diamonds?

Concord Times (Freetown)
Posted to the web 19 March 2008
Tanu Jalloh Freetown

The Jenkins-Johnston Commission of Enquiry, set up to look into the fatal standoff between locals and security personnel of the Koidu Holdings mining company in Kono yesterday questioned Sierra Leonean ownership of the country's minerals.

Formally presenting the 105-page report, including proceedings, findings, conclusions, reasons for the conclusions and recommendations to President Ernest Bai Koroma at State House chairman of the inquest lawyer Blyden Jenkins-Johnston noted with grief that: "It is fundamental to note that even though Sierra Leone has been in the mining business for some 75 odd years, there has never been any document, legislative or otherwise, that states or reflects that the minerals belong to the people of Sierra Leone and not to those who have to mine." He further reiterated that in the Commission's view investors should be made to know that there has to be a "reasonable partnership" where the owners must be seen to be benefiting.

The bloody fracas that prompted the setting up of the enquiry occurred on December 13, 2007 when locals took to the streets of the diamond rich town of Kono demanding that Koidu Holdings Ltd must address their grievances after 21-day ultimatum expired. In the process security personnel reportedly shot and killed two of the demonstrators while many more were injured.

The human right lawyer observed that they were not only mandated to look at the discontent between the people and Koidu Holdings, but to search for the root causes as well.

"Although we were appointed on December 12, 2007, we travelled to Kono on the January 19, met with Paramount Chiefs, and had a church service the following day before we actually commenced work the next day," he said.

The investigators interviewed 42 witnesses and got 79 separate exhibits. Apart from witnesses under oath, they also took statements from more than 30 other people but who were found to be duplicating evidence earlier obtained.

However, Jenkins-Johnston was skeptical about the implementation of the 17 recommendations five of which relate to the incidence and twelve relate to the causes of the discontentment. He expressed fear that in the past many commissions of enquiry have been set up but their reports ended up being locked away and forgotten.

Meanwhile the President said the report was timely because government was just at the point of reviewing all mining licenses and leases.

"We believe Sierra Leone has not been getting a fair share of its riches," the President said, adding that "this is not to threaten investors but that we should all be partners in development." He said Sierra Leone must have something to show as owners of minerals, maintaining that government will look at what is contained in the report.

"On behalf of government, I'll accept the report. It will be studied and it will not be shelved," he assured.

***

Diamond Imports


Buy Only Fair Trade Diamonds



Subscribe in a reader

Botswana: Creating a New African Trading Diamond Market

AFP

The transfer of skills from abroad should put the country on the map as never before, and change the face of its diamond industry


Keeping the Sparkle at Home
Mar 19th 2008 GABORONE From The Economist print edition

African diamond producers want to extract more value from their stones


AT THE new Eurostar diamond cutting factory in Gaborone, the capital of Botswana, hundreds of workers in neat rows are labouring over tiny stones. Eurostar, an Indian-owned diamond cutting and trading company headquartered in Belgium, set up in Botswana in 2004 and has been training locals to polish and cut diamonds. The factory, which employs 456 people and shapes about 1,000 stones a day, hopes to expand to over 1,000 employees. Another 15 big international diamond firms also have operations in Botswana, the world's largest diamond producer.

Until recently Botswana, a country of 1.8m people that produces 27% of the world's diamonds by value, exported only rough stones. The government, which is struggling to diversify its economy and create jobs, wants to get more out of its main commodity. Cutting adds about 40% to the value of rough stones. But the idea, explains Akolang Tombale, the permanent secretary of the ministry of minerals and energy, is to create an international diamond centre that not only cuts and polishes, but also trades diamonds and provides security, technology and financial services. The government hopes this will spill over into other sectors and help diversify the economy. For now, the diamond industry should create over 3,000 jobs by the end of next year.

A significant step in that direction was the opening in Botswana on March 18th of a Diamond Trading Company (DTC), a joint venture between De Beers, a big diamond producer, and the government. ( See here Botswana launches its own diamond trading company )
De Beers, which produces about 40% of the world's diamonds, extracts almost all of Botswana's stones through Debswana, its partnership with the government. In 2006, when its mining licence and sales agreement in Botswana came up for renewal, De Beers agreed to open a DTC in Gaborone. The swanky new centre sorts and values local rough stones and, by 2009, expects to sell $550m-worth of diamonds to the 16 carefully selected international firms that were required to set up shop in the country to be allowed to buy. From next year De Beers will also aggregate all the diamonds it markets—45% of world production—in Botswana rather than London.

Turning Botswana into an international diamond centre will not be easy, though. About 58% of the world's diamonds are cut in India, where labour is cheap and the government provides attractive incentives. Other Asian centres, such as China and Thailand, are rising fast. The long-established cutting centres in Israel, and to a lesser extent Belgium and America, remain competitive for the largest, most valuable diamonds. Antwerp is still where many of the world's polished diamonds are bought and sold. Botswana's production costs are three times those in India. It does not make economic sense to cut very small diamonds there.

Mr Tombale admits that unionised Botswana cannot compete on labour costs with India. But when demand outstrips supply, access to rough stones is a key attraction, as is the government's attitude, says Mervin Lifshitz, who chairs the Botswana Diamond Manufacturers' Association. The country tops the regional charts for good management and low corruption.

South Africa and Namibia, the fifth- and sixth-largest diamond producers, are also keen to make more of their diamonds. But unlike Botswana, which is happy to have its stones mixed with those from other countries, both its neighbours have decided to earmark a portion of their own production for local manufacturing. Namibia has set up a DTC with De Beers to sort and value the country's production and sell a fraction of it to the 11 manufacturers it has licensed. And on February 29th South Africa launched the State Diamond Trader, which will buy up to 10% of diamonds extracted locally to resell to small cutters, who complain that they cannot buy enough diamonds.

Critics point out that most South African diamonds cannot be profitably cut at home. Yet rather than selecting those that can be, the State Diamond Trader will buy a representative selection of production. It says it will pay market prices, but producers are concerned that they may have to sell on the cheap. Local manufacturers also point out that the duty, tax and currency regime is not as favourable as in India or Israel. Fixing those problems might be a better way to boost the local industry than forcing diamonds to stay at home.


***

Diamond Imports

Diamonds of Excellence


Subscribe in a reader

iPhone Princess Plus - World’s Most Expensive iPhone bearing Diamonds costs $176,400

Veils over the costliest iPhone have been lifted.

Designed by Austrian jeweler and designer Peter Aloisson, the sleek ‘iPhone Princess Plus’ is studded with 318 diamonds, 17.75 carats of diamond and the music phone is also gleaming with 18k of gold around the rim.

This flashing beauty is priced at $176,400 USD, which makes it the priciest iPhone of all.

One may think that since it is priced at such a high rate, there would be few or perhaps no buyers for it.

But surprisingly a Russian businessman had already pre-ordered it in October 2007 and the handset has been delivered to him in January 2008.

The phone features yet remain untouched and the iPhone Princess Plus stands a class apart from the rest of the iPhones and also comes with a heavy price tag.

So the next time, when your loved one is planning to gift you a plain diamond bracelet or ring, you may want to re-consider demanding for the iPhone Princess Plus instead.

***

Diamond Imports

Diamonds of Excellence


Subscribe in a reader

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

BEWARE Bogus Diamond Website Listings

" Where is there dignity unless

there is honesty ?"

CICERO

TRADE ALERT


***

BEWARE OF BOGUS DIAMOND WEBSITE LISTINGS

FROM

DROP SHIPPERS

&

" WANNA-BE "

DIAMOND DEALERS


This may seem like a small thing but it isn't.

If the website does NOT have the diamond certificate number listed then it is a bogus listing.

It is as simple as that. They are drop shippers marketing virtual diamonds with either none to very little diamond experience.

Make sure the diamond IS IN STOCK and has the certificate number with the listing and
VERIFY THE REPORT NUMBER with the laboratory if possible.

This is how you sort the genuine web site diamond vendors from the dangerous rogue traders.

~~~

In light of the GIA bribery scandal ," Certifigate " , and our strong support of Chaim Even-Zohar's revelations we refuse to stock ANY NEW GIA graded diamonds offered to us both for ethical reasons and many inaccurate diamond colour and clarity grades.

Likewise anyone dealing in GIA graded diamonds is NOT someone we wish to deal with until GIA’s Gem Trade Laboratory decides to disclose the bribers' names and comes clean in order to inadvertently avoid dealing with a GIA briber.

Diamond vendors can not be absolved of any wrong doing hiding behind a diamond grading report recognised or unrecognised.

They have both a moral and ethical duty of care to their clients

GIA is NOT an IDC diamond grading laboratory.

Their colour grading standards are simply not as strict and Diamond Imports is not prepared to jeopardise their reputation unlike other diamond vendors who sell any diamond just for the sake of closing a sale.

With the advent of the ever growing internet diamond retail market the concept of drop shipping has become prevalent.

Drop shipping has enabled websites to give the appearance of a fully stocked retail business without the costs, overheads, knowledge or experience associated with running a business.

Drop shipping has opened the door for many new dealers, markets and also scams.

A lot of these drop shippers advertise GIA graded diamonds that are not in stock and do so to add false credibility to their websites.

Hence now why GIA grading reports are now being referred as the Internet Certificate , a common report for the most ordinary diamond vendors marketing to the most mediocre clients.

The only difference is professional diamantaires do NOT trust GIA reports, carry real stock and show the greatest respect to those diamond buyers who have done their own research prior to purchasing their chosen diamond.

Diamond Imports has a duty of care to their clients and if GIA's is living off their past reputation we no longer trust GIA's integrity until the disclosure of the names of the GIA bribers.

Read The Real Truth about GIA diamond grading reports here

In Australia as a precaution prior to purchasing a diamond we recommend verifying the diamond if it comes from GIA, EGL, IGI because these diamonds are being dumped and in addition exercise caution if a diamond grading report comes from a non compliant diamond grading laboratory.

BUYERS BEWARE

Hooorooo from De Guru

Daniel F Katz GG

***

Diamond Imports

Excellence in Diamonds

All Our Diamonds Are In Stock



Subscribe in a reader

Botswana launches its own diamond trading company


The premises boasts 39 diamond sorting machines
able to distinguish between gemstones in 29 different colours

GABORONE (AFP) — Botswana launches its own diamond trading company on Tuesday in a move designed to boost local business and create jobs for citizens of the world's top producer of these precious stones.

Thousands of Batswana are to become diamond sorters, valuers and marketers employed by the Diamond Trading Company Botswana (DTCB), described by diamond firm De Beers -- a joint partner in the deal -- as the most sophisticated of its kind in the world.

The creation of the DTCB, a joint venture between De Beers and the Botswana government, will end the practice of sending diamonds mined in Botswana to De Beers' London-based main Diamond Trading Company for sorting and marketing.

Botswana is the world's largest producer of diamonds by value and by volume, yielding 34.3 million carats of the gemstones from its four open-cast mines in 2006 -- worth some 17.4 billion pulas (2.6 billion dollars, 1.6 billion euros).

In anticipation of the official launch in the capital Gaborone on Tuesday evening, De Beers has already started training locals in sorting, valuing and trading -- skills formerly reserved for its London-based staff.

When completed by the end of next year, this would be one of the biggest-ever transfers of skills from the United Kingdom to Africa, company literature said.

The DTCB building, erected and equipped by De Beers at a cost of some 83 million dollars, has the capacity to process 45 million carats of diamonds a year.

The premises boasts 39 diamond sorting machines, able to distinguish between gemstones in 29 different colours.

The DTCB expects to sell 375 million dollars worth of rough diamonds to its 16 Botswana-based diamond cutter clients this year, and 550 million dollars by the end of 2009.

Last year, diamonds worth over 270 million dollars were supplied to local cutters, providing some 2,000 jobs, according to De Beers.

"This is a dramatic increase on the 2006 figure of 135 million dollars and shows a rapid expansion of the local industry since the (Botswana) government and De Beers decided to create DTC Botswana and develop the down stream industry in May 2006," said a statement.
The DTCB has since the beginning of 2008 started taking over the operations of the Botswana Diamond Valuing Corporation.

De Beers, which has been operating in Botswana since 1969, jointly owns local mining company Debswana with the government.

Debswana produces more than 30 million carats of diamonds a year, about 22 percent of the world's output. It employs some 6,300 workers, about 95 percent of them Batswana.

The biggest of the Debswana mines, Jwaneng, about 160 kilometres (100 miles) southwest of Gaborone, is the world's richest by production value.

Rough diamonds are Botswana's largest industry, contributing 50 percent of public revenue, 33 percent of gross domestic product and 70 percent of foreign exchange earnings.

The DTCB employs some 500 workers to date, a number it hopes to increase to over 3,000 next year.

"This is a great day for Botswana and its nationals," DTCB director Brian McDonald said Tuesday, adding that workers moved into the new building last week.

Newly trained diamond sorter and valuer Irene Botsweletse, a 38-year-old former teacher, agreed.

"I am happy to be alive to witness this day when skills will be formally transferred to Botswana nationals" she said.

"I am happy in this job which has provided me most of the good things of life. I was trained here, bought my car on this job and I also got a mortgage loan to buy my house."

The formal launch on Tuesday evening would see outgoing Botswana President Festus Mogae officially commissioning the DTCB in the company of De Beers chairman Nicky Oppenheimer and other dignitaries.

***

DTC opens in Botswana

*

Beneficiation: Africa's Diamond Dream

*

Is Africa Ready For Beneficiation?

***

Diamond Imports



Subscribe in a reader

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

The One Million Dollar Big Bang Watch.


A watch that’s second to none
By
Reena Amos Dyes on Monday, March 17 , 2008

Imagine a jewellery watch so finely made that all the diamonds on its case seem to be held together by magic as the gold used for setting the stones is invisible. Yes, it is hard to believe – but it is true!


Switzerland’s Hublot, known the world over for its beautiful luxury timepieces, has come up with yet another masterpiece, the One Million Dollar Big Bang watch.

The watch is the very symbol of the fusion between jewellery and watchmaking. The case is made from 18 carat white gold and is set with 322 baguette diamonds weighing 24.65 carats.
It has a crystal sapphire and white gold back and a white gold crown in which 12 white baguette diamonds weighing 0.8 carats have been set.

The dial is 18 carat white gold and palladium set with 129 baguette diamonds weighing 6.4 carats with diamond-polished faceted skeleton hands.


However, all the gold and palladium that has been used to create this watch is invisible and has prompted experts to label it “a world first” and “a dream become reality” and to compare it to a Faberge egg, which is perhaps the biggest compliment of all.


“The idea was to make the most beautiful and unique jewellery watch where you see only the diamonds and no other material,” Hublot CEO Jean-Claude Biver told Emirates Business. “We wanted to achieve a world first in the jewellery watch segment.


“I was driving when the product manager from Hublot called and described the concept to me. Usually I never give approval without first seeing the design but the whole concept appealed to me so much that I said ‘yes’ immediately.


“I did not back out even when he cautioned me that the chances for success were just 85 per cent and that we could lose quite a bit of our investment. Then right after I got off the phone with him I called one of my friends in Monaco who is also my best jeweller.


I described the concept to her and asked if she would ever buy a watch like that and she too said ‘yes’ without a moment’s hesitation.


“So the watch was ordered on the phone and sold on the phone. All within 15 minutes. No contract, no nothing, just mutual credibility and trust. That was in my opinion the biggest asset and success of this operation.”


Once the decision to go ahead was made Hublot teamed up with the Bunter SA diamond-setting workshop and together they set to work to meet the challenge.

Surrounding themselves with the finest craftsmen and specialists, they developed and utilised the most advanced technology to explore new avenues and create this masterpiece, something that would have been impossible a few years ago.


Even though this type of setting had been tried before but it had never been achieved in such a complex form. Sophisticated icromechanics enabled craftsmen to work to 1/100th of a degree.
Although similar in shape to the Big Bang model, the Million Dollar version has a monobloc construction in white gold.


A grand total of 493 Top Wesselton baguette diamonds of different sizes conceal a Tourbillon movement. The natural rubber bracelet has a deployant buckle with a diamond-set clasp.


“Four highly skilled craftsmen are involved in the making of each watch and it takes them more than 2,000 hours to make one,” added Biver. “We produce only three to four pieces a year and we intend making only 10 of these timepieces. Each will have a different dial and movement and so will be unique.”


***
Diamond Imports

Unique Independently Certified Diamonds


Subscribe in a reader

GIA Bribery Accusations: Correspondence awaiting reply

TRADE ALERT

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Daniel Katz"

Date: 18 March 2008 4:31:15 AM

To: "'Chaim Even-Zohar'", "'Donna Baker'" , "'Ralph Destino'" , "'Tom Moses''
Cc: "'Kirsten Katz'" , "'Ian Hadassin'"
Subject: RE: GIA BRIBERY SCANDAL : REMOVE US FROM YOUR EMAIL LIST: updated list
Chaim & Anon
I hope that this problem will be solved for the benefit of all.
My respect and support for GIA’s educational and research facilities are unquestionable.
My issue is with Gem Trade Laboratory.
We are simply not prepared to take the risk.
I remind you all GTL’s motto is “Integrity”
Messrs Baker, Destino and Moses,
Please disclose the names of the bribers and this will be the first step to restoring GIA’s integrity.
If you do not, the truth will prevail despite your resistance and will only cause further damage to GIA’s reputation leaving an indelible stain for years to come.
We regret the perception is that presently GIA’s continued recalcitrance is uncaring and arrogant.
Until then we will be advising all our clients not to trust GIA grading reports and to verify all GIA graded diamonds are accurately graded via the IDC diamond grading laboratory, the DCLA in Sydney Australia as a precaution prior to any purchase of a GIA graded diamond.
Sincerely and respectfully yours,
Daniel F Katz GG
Benitem Pty Ltd
ALL OUR DIAMONDS ARE IN STOCK
~~~
From: Daniel Katz
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:12 PM
To: Subject: GIA BRIBERY SCANDAL : REMOVE US FROM YOUR EMAIL LIST: updated list
Sirs,
Please remove us from your email address list. Any dealer with a hotmail address does not inspire confidence.
GIA’s Gem Trading Laboratory graded diamond reports are now considered inferior and are being referred to as the “Internet Certificate “
In light of the GIA bribery scandal and our strong support of Tacy Ltd revelations we refuse to stock any new GIA graded diamonds offered to us both for ethical reasons and many inaccurate diamond colour and clarity grades.
In addition we do not approve of the GIA cut grading system. It simply does not make any sense. GIA excellent cut diamonds with 62% tables are in our opinion misrepresentations and confuse any serious buyer.
Likewise anyone dealing in GIA graded diamonds is not someone we wish to deal with until GIA’s Gem Trade Laboratory decides to disclose the bribers and comes clean in order to inadvertently avoid dealing with a GIA briber.
We have a duty of care to our clients. We are strongly urging potential clients prior to purchasing a GIA graded diamond to verify the specifications as a precaution with an independent International Diamond Council diamond grading laboratory such as HRD or DCLA who we believe are honourable and accurate.
I suggest you do the same.
Thank you for your kind understanding,
Daniel F Katz GG
Benitem Pty Ltd
Sydney Australia
~~~
From: nikhil shah [mailto:xxxxxxxdiamond@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 14 March 2008 8:03 PM
Subject: updated list
Sir,

Above attach file is the updated list of GIA CERTIFIED STONES.

See if you can use any from the list.

If useful do let us know.

Regards,

Nihkil.
***

Diamond iPod is world's most expensive

The world's most expensive MP3 player has been put up for sale at a charity auction in London.

The iDiamond iPod and accompanying earplugs are made of solid 18 karat white and pink gold and encrusted with 430 diamonds.

Norwegian jeweller Thomas Heyerdahl based the design on the Apple iPod shuffle and has donated the end result to a charity auction in London.

Estimated to be worth £20,000, the glittering music player went under the hammer at The Feast of Albion fundraising dinner at the Guildhall last night.


Featuring performances by Annie Lennox and David Jordan among others, the exclusive event was held by luxury group Quintessentially to support the Soil Association.


The iDiamond was part of an auction prize which also included a chauffeured Jaguar XJ and VIP tickets to see Pink Floyd's Roger Waters perform Dark Side of the Moon for the final time as well as other money-can't-buy additions.


Speaking about his creation – which has 118 diamonds in the headphones alone – Mr Heyerdahl confirmed that he would not be making another one.


"It's a special thing, making just one," he told ITN.


"If we had make this for commercial sale, it would be quite a different thing because then you have to take care of, much more things to make it work commercially."


***

Diamond Imports

Highest Quality Certified Diamonds


Source
Subscribe in a reader

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Credibility Factors : Who is a Genuine Diamond Wholesaler ?



Diamond Imports are a Leading Australian Diamond Wholesaler

A Message to our " Competitors "
~~~

Definition of Wholesale
The sale of goods in quantity, as to retailers or jobbers, for resale
Definition of Retailer
The sale of goods to ultimate consumers, usually in small quantities opposed to wholesale

What is the difference between a diamond wholesaler and a diamond retailer ?

In years gone by there was a very clear distinction.

Diamond wholesalers rarely sold diamonds to the public. It was an unofficial understanding.

The diamond retailer / diamond vendor either purchased diamonds or took the diamonds on consignment and put the desired retail margin on which was usually 100% or more.This retail margin has been now seriously eroded due to competition.

The reason we are writing this is because we have noticed subtle messages from desperate competitors' websites alluding to us as genuine diamond wholesalers not being possible.

But times have changed for the following reasons:

1) Most diamond retailers have high overheads. They will pay their rent and their employees before they pay their suppliers. It's a fact of life these days and payments can take from 30 to 90 days and sometimes never. The wholesaler is an unsecured creditor.

This is why we are prepared to charge wholesale prices to the public because we are paid immediately.The price includes our broking fee, certification, shipping ,GST and our expert advice for which we charge nothing. ( Try to get free advice out of your blood sucking lawyer or accountant ).

2) With the advent of the online internet diamond vendors who are springing up everywhere these days like sand flies, the problem began when they commenced marketing diamonds at wholesale prices direct to the public.

This has caused radical changes to the diamond market so much so that the dividing line between wholesale and retail is almost now non existent.

The buying public never had it so good and diamonds have become like houses. Can you buy a house wholesale?

It's because of the very actions of the earliest internet diamond vendors who started selling diamonds well below what most retailers could compete against that the diamond market has changed radically and in turn those who adapted to this change are now the new survivors of a completely different diamond market compared to 20 years ago... 10 years ago ...5 years ago and until today.

Diamond vendors have had to buy better and some do and some don't.

A lot of this has to do with better diamond education. Both seller and buyer are pumping gas when it comes to acquiring facts and figures to the point that some forget to look at the diamond.

The one common denominator in all of this is the humble diamond solitaire. A single diamond.

If it's all you specialise in, one single type of product, and considering engagement rings tend to be a special occasion purchase, then we would tend to agree that the diamond vendor more than likely is a retailer.

Those internet retailers who pretend to be " wholesalers " online usually become quite transparent when it comes to viewing the diamond especially when the diamond is somewhere on the other side of the world on a suppliers stock sheet.

Imagine the risk to the diamond buyer dealing with an inexperienced online internet diamond retailer promising you the best of everything ? Why did you make the appointment ?

Before you depart you might as well request if they could provide you with a complimentary glass of fresh air because you throat is dry after wasting your time asking the diamond vendor useless questions about your virtual diamond that may or may not even exist.

The diamond solitaire is why the majority of diamond vendors are all competing against each other to win the confidence of a potential client.

The methods they use have been discussed in our previous stories suffice to say we have warned about the pitfalls.

Most of these diamond vendors do not have the capital to hold large stocks of diamonds.They too have to pay rent and wages.

Apart from the many diamonds advertised they do not have in stock, they are able to still source diamonds locally from those domestic diamond dealers who wish to support them and wait for their money. ( Good Luck ! )

They also have little to no experience. The oldest diamond website in Australia boasts being ten years in existence yet has barely any reasonable size stock and what is available is pretty ordinary.However it does provide us all here with plenty of amusement.

One of the websites that boasts of international offices all around the world, as if it matters to the buyer, has been around for slightly less, has too many partners who know even less with no background in diamonds and an owner with a dubious past who has changed his name by deed poll because he has been a naughty little man back in Africa. We know more about them than they know about themselves. They carry less diamond stock than ants who collect rose aphids but claim to have tens of thousands of diamonds ALWAYS BASED ON A CHEAP PRICE NEVER BASED ON THE DIAMONDS' ACTUAL GRADINGS HOPEFULLY ACCURATE.

Always check the diamond you are interested in is available ex stock immediately and request a copy of the certificate to be faxed to you promptly with the price including GST.

These internet sleaze bags become members of trade organisations to assist their otherwise unknown diamond pedigree adding further flavour to the sauce.It's one big illusion. Joining diamond dealers clubs and jewellery trade organisations are easy attainable. Just pay and you can hide inside the fraternity hoping you have convinced the diamond buyer you are an honourable trader.

This is despite wild claims of plush office suites worldwide pictured on their websites giving the illusion that you are dealing with a huge corporation and able to procure diamonds from international sources, owning diamond mines and having interests in diamond cutting companies. Regular living breathing tycoons who are legends in their own lunch boxes. ( Tossers !) New York London Geneva Paris Tokyo etc and of course .... melbourne????

We must of missed it when we blinked. It's no accident that the comedian Jerry Seinfeld referred to Melbourne as being the arse hole of the world. Those dodgy diamond dealers in Melbourne just add to the flavour.

This is NOT how the diamond business operates. Out of the top 20 diamond dealers in the world some of who I know personally, you are talking about immensely humble human beings who would never behave like the wanna be bigshots in Australia's tiny diamond market.

Let me assure you that we know some of these real tycoons also and they are not in Australia ! Australia is simply not the market for such grandiose claims. Those who have diamond mines and diamond cutting factories barely realise Australia exists with a population of only 20 million when 50% of the world diamond market is in America and the rest in Asia and Europe.

How they claim to know a diamond's quality they have never laid eyes on is irrelevant despite claiming these huge business interests in some one's imaginary diamond cutting factory. Well hells bells I am impressed!...um er but er why don't they have the diamond in stock er der ! ?

They are the creators of the virtual diamond market. In other words what they don't see, you are advised to buy. Hardly ethical but let's not go there...enough has been said already.

Diamond Imports are different in that ALL OUR DIAMONDS ARE IN STOCK unless marked sold. (and we do not even have a single mine shaft or diamond cutting factory named after us boo hoo )

This policy of holding real diamond stock has forced a few of our " competitors " to carry some actual diamond stock. It hurts. We know.

The idea that other jewellers would resent us because we are selling directly to the public as implied by these dweebs of diamond land may be true amongst some but it has been happening a lot longer than most realise and besides we refuse to give credit or consignments simply because we could not be bothered.

Those jealous jewellers usually resent everybody anyway and the serious jewellers who have a trade background disciplined in manufacturing respect us as much as we respect them simply because we have done our time in the business together,over thirty years in fact, which is three times longer than the oldest diamond website in Australia.

We are not immune to criticism however we are not reliant upon jewellers buying from us either.

This is why we have gone direct to the public. Waiting for a jeweller or a diamond vendor to buy and pay for a diamond we would starve to death.

Jewellers have a wide choice to select from. They can buy from other diamond wholesalers who may also sell to the public and tend to be a lot more polite.

Jewellers provide an added value service and would have your best interest at heart if they valued you as a client. They are a wealth of knowledge unlike the internet diamond website dealers who have only one focus by selling a single product. The internet diamond vendors remind me of horses wearing blinkers and only their business ethics smell more.

They have been blown away that an actual diamantaire should actually pull off what they are incapable of doing. An effort in at least being honest instead of merely appearing to be would be a helpful start.

Some of them have installed their own in-house diamond grading labs. Why? Because it adds to the illusion and mystique that you are dealing with a genuine diamond dealer or diamantaire.They mix their dodgy diamond certificates with genuine ones to further add to their false credibility.

Actually in-house diamond grading reports are pointless because that is the purpose of an independent diamond grading report. If there is no such report available and the diamond dealer is trying to sell you a diamond with one of their own in-house grading reports, trade reports or manufacturers' grading reports just walk straight out.

Jewellery is something that a lot of the online internet diamond retailers have no clue about because very few have a real background in the diamond jewellery business. Most are just manipulative conspiring opportunists with no real feel for the diamond business and that's a fact ! The jewellery they advertise is just plain down right ugly, cheap and quite honestly your jewellery chain stores have a better quality product.

They promote brand named jewellery only because they have no idea what they are looking at.Why anyone would want to pay for a mass produced piece of crap after buying a nice diamond is beyond a joke but this happens because those diamond website tycoons need to clutch onto a product that might inspire confidence. Clients who want to buy this sort of rubbish are not the clients we want.

Buying a diamond from an internet diamond retailer with no background in the jewellery business is a sterile hollow experience. The larger firms employ drones because the real owners know even less. Fundamentally the real owners are as shallow as their services.

Diamond Imports does not just sell single solitaire diamonds.

We carry a full range of precious diamond products and other services.

* Hand made manufactured engagement rings and individual designs.
* Small round brilliants and princess cuts
*Calibrated fancy shapes
* Old Mine Cuts for antique created jewellery
* Single Cut rounds
* Small rare pink and yellow diamonds
* Black diamonds
* Matching diamond pairs
* Calibrated small blue , pink and black square, round and baguette sapphires
* African Emeralds
* Gold chain and bracelets
* Diamond earrings
* Sterling Silverware
and much more with expert advice with over thirty years of experience.

Therefore those competitors who feel threatened by us due to our high profile in the petite boutique Australian diamond industry should explore different avenues rather than feebly attacking us. We are genuine wholesalers.It's a simple fact and we know it drives some of our competitors mad.

So if you mention our name, Diamond Imports, please stand back while our competitors begin frothing at the mouth, their eyes begin to bulge and they lose all composure.It's not their fault. Call 000 and leave.

It's not our fault the internet diamond retailers are losing business.They forget it never was their business in the first place considering so many have appeared from no where and other professions where they never excelled. This is competition. This is life.

We are flattered that they should plagiarise our website and even copy our wording but at the end of the day we are not worried.

Why ? Because we are small.... very very small. In fact there are only two of us. It's a personal business and we like it that way.

So when you think of a large diamond wholesaler in Australia, without offices worldwide, without our own diamond mines, without vast interests in imaginary diamond cutting factories, without virtual diamonds, without high tech technology giving the appearance of being experts,without employing huge staff and without paying high rents...think of Diamond Imports, genuine diamond wholesalers with just a little bit more (((smile))) and a personal touch compared to none. On a good day we might even be real nice to you and buy you a real cup of coffee at the local deli...our shout whether you buy a diamond or not.

Do not be fooled by inane offers of price matching comparisons but rather base your purchase of your chosen diamond with visual diamond comparisons instead. This is the only true way to make price comparisons rather than comparing data between diamond certificates.

Remember the key to the diamond buyer's protection is a diamond certificate from a recognised compliant diamond grading laboratory that still requires verification.

Manufacturing handmade jewellery is an art form not a commodity.

Kiss Her With A Diamond

Daniel & Kirsten Katz

Experienced Jewellers, Diamond and Gem Merchants.

***
Diamond Imports
Australia's Leading Diamond Wholesaler
ALL OUR DIAMONDS ARE IN STOCK


Subscribe in a reader

Bauer Gemmological Laboratories : Possible Damage Caused by Hot Laser Inscriptions

References have been made to the damage caused by 'Hot Laser Inscriptions.'

Above is a photo of a diamond that has been inscribed and damaged by a hot laser.

Note the laser penetration behind each of the numbers which looks like a severe case of bearding. Sometimes it is worse if there is penetration.

Girdle Fringes sometimes referred to as "Bearding".

Girdle Fringes are hair-like lines that can occur around the girdle during the cutting process. They can sometimes be removed by polished or re-cutting which will reduce the weight of the diamond.
~~~
Currently in Australia only the DCLA use cold laser inscription.
*

The Australian non compliant diamond grading laboratories are using hot laser

*
Below appears answers to questions mooted by Ronnie Bauer of Melbourne - Bauer Gemological Laboratories, one of the non complaint diamond grading laboratories listed that employs the use of a hot laser inscriber that may cause damage.

*

Non-compliance is defined as a ‘breach’ situation where a legal process has not been commenced. In other words, each case of non-compliance represents a risk that has yet to be realised.
*

" The whole issue of laser inscribing has to be looked at. " said Ronnie Bauer defensively.

That is why I have sent a letter to the Australian CIBJO representatives (GAA/JAA) asking them to raise the following" said Ronnie Bauer.

Answers to Ronnie Bauer's questions are given by Michael Cohen of the DCLA, Sydney Australia.

Issues that we see need to have guidelines are:

" Q Ronnie Bauer 1. The type of font used.

A DCLA 1. The type of font used presents no technical or ethical dilemma whatsoever with respect to the effect on the diamond.

Q Ronnie Bauer 2. the size (microns) of the text/numbers.

A DCLA 2. The size of the inscription presents no technical or ethical dilemma whatsoever with respect to the effect on the diamond, other than the visibility of the inscription.

Q Ronnie Bauer 3. the depth of the inscription (dot point).

A DCLA 3. If the laser inscription penetrates the diamond it would be graded as an inclusion.

Q Ronnie Bauer 4. the position of the inscription on the gemstone on the girdle and on other facets (especially on fancy cuts).

A DCLA 4. Laser inscription is only for the girdle lasering on "other facets" would lower the finish grade of the stone.

Q Ronnie Bauer 5. The length of an inscription (amount of characters).

A DCLA 5. The length of the inscription presents no technical or ethical dilemma whatsoever with respect to the effect on the diamond.

Q Ronnie Bauer 6. The quality of the girdle upon an inscription is applied.

A DCLA 6. The photoscribe cold laser machine is the only machine guaranteed to inscribe on any quality of girdle with out causing damage.

Q Ronnie Bauer 7. copyright issues logos, security codes, certificate numbers

A DCLA 7. Copyright issues are dealt with through existing legislation both locally and internationally.

Q Ronnie Bauer 8. the voiding of certifications due to subsequent inscribing.

A DCLA 8. It is up to the individual laboratory to decide whether or not the certificate is still valid,particularly when a potentially damaging HOT laser has been used after the diamond has been graded and a certificate has been issued.

Q Ronnie Bauer 9. The amount of inscriptions per stone.

A DCLA 9. The number of inscriptions presents no technical or ethical dilemma whatsoever with respect to the effect on the diamond.

Any individual or company would have an ethical and moral obligation to firstly check that the diamond is the diamond referred to by the certificate prior to inscribing that certificate number onto it as well as informing the owner of the diamond that the hot laser inscription may result in damage to the diamond therefore voiding the certificate. "
~~~
If you receive a diamond which has been laser inscribed DCLA advises you to check:

1. THE DIAMOND CERTIFICATE NOTES THE LASER INSCRIPTION.

2. THE LASER INSCRIPTION HAS THE LOGO OF THE LABORATORY PRECEDING THE NUMBER.
*
If either of these is missing, we suggest having your diamond checked by the laboratory that issued the certificate to ensure that it is the correct diamond and that the clarity has not been altered.

01/03/07

***

We find the questions posed by Ronnie Bauer do not address the issues.
He asks a lot but says nothing.
*
It does not change the fact what he is doing is a risk therefore non compliant.
*
In addition Mr Bauer owns a retail jewelllery store called " Klepners " , Fine Antique Jewellery & Valuers since 1889.
On the bottom right hand corner of Klepner's home page the BGL logo appears and endorses his own " laboratory " as follows:
" For laser inscription and comprehensive gemstone analysis and certification, we recommend Bauer Gemmological Laboratories. Visit: www.bauergemlabs.com.au "
*
We note Bauer Gemmological Laboratories is plural. Is there more than one ? Or is this an attempt to convince others this is a big " lab "? Our colleagues in Melbourne tell us Mr Bauer operates this "lab" from the back of his retail store Klepner's.
*
Here we have the same situation as Auscert; BGL claims they grade to " exacting standards".
*
BGL is another pseudo diamond grading laboratory issuing non compliant diamond grading certificates and valuing also, while blatantly trading and once again... guess where ? in Melbourne ! the city that is to diamonds what Sodom and Gomorah was to celibacy.
*
" Ronnie Bauer, Klepner's owner, has over thirty years experience and expertise in fine, antique and vintage jewellery. He is known as a jeweller's jeweller. Other jewellers frequently come to him to authenticate and value an item " as stated on Klepner's website under the valuation heading.
*
A jeweller's jeweller ? How can a jeweller's jeweller be regarded as even remotely independent or impartial when valuing an item of jewellery let alone certify diamonds ?
*
If ever there was the slightest indication of possible collusion by having special relationships between jewellers influencing a valuation or a diamond grade, Mr Bauer in his own words admits to this; a man who endorses his own " lab " via his retail outlet and hot laser inscribes diamonds.
*
I would hesitate to ask what measures " Bauer's Lab " has taken to determine treated and synthetic diamonds and what registered master set BGL uses for colour grading comparisons.
*
I am convinced there must be something in the drinking water in Melbourne. They are all mad down there !
Above
Another unrecognisable Melbourne gemmologist in standard
"approved" gemmological white jacket appearing very professional
after escaping from the Moonee Ponds Gemmological Evaluation Asylum.
For a complete waste of your money please contact a member of the
in your mental state.
*
Traders can not be Graders.Traders can not be Valuers. It is a conflict of interest.
*
Those internet diamond vendors who display the Bauer Gemmological Laboratories and Auscert logoes on their websites are also not to be trusted because they are seeking a false endorsement and are not believable.
BGL and Auscert both from Melbourne are unrecognised and non compliant.
~~~
Buying Diamonds In Melbourne Australia

The Melbourne diamond scene for years has been like a small village of misfits. There is no place like it in the world.

Basically if someone farts they all hear it.They all know each other. They all bitch about each other. Gossip mongers, friends one day enemies tomorrow there is no accountability.Most of the older established diamond dealers have moved on or passed away.

There are a handful left that I still have respect for but basically Melbourne has been over run by the "cowboys". A new breed of diamond merchant that has no respect for the time honoured principals of ethics and pride.Unprofessional, uneducated and uncaring.

All they want is your money without considering the long term future relationships that can develop future business.

The fact that we receive more complaints about Melbourne than any other part of the country confirms our suspicions that the diamond buyer must at all times exercise caution when purchasing a diamond from those who hide behind their facades.

The main offenders are website dealers who offer very little knowledge or service.

Those retailers who avail themselves of unrecognised diamond certificates as a shield of protection do not realise the potential damage to their reputations and the risk of losing a good client because they choose to use " Mickey Mouse " diamond grading reports or do their own in-house diamond grading reports.

Considering most diamond merchants all know each other and those who act as go-betweens by falsely claiming they are independent diamond graders when they are not, is no accident that some diamonds receive up grades that no independent diamond grading laboratory would give normally.
A bit of the " nudge nudge wink wink say no more " old buddy network can influence a diamond's grade without even looking at it.
*
Diamond Buyers Protection Advice
*
Ask yourself why would an Australian diamond vendor NOT want to sell a diamond with a recognised compliant diamond grading report ?
*
And ask yourself why isn't a diamond DCLA certified
if you are buying it in Australia ?
*
What possible purpose would a foreign diamond grading report
serve the buyer in Australia ?
*
The truth is that usually the Australian diamond vendor
has something to hide.
*
How can a diamond with a foreign diamond grading report's specifications be verified in Australia ?
*
Email guru@diamondimports.com.au for the answer.
*
Daniel F Katz GG
***
Diamond Imports

Correctly Verified Cold Laser Inscribed Diamonds


Subscribe in a reader

Rare & Fancy Diamonds : Celebrity Diamonds ?

Presidents get married to respectable women, have children and lead a low-key, non-controversial life. Or so we thought until Super Sarko aka Nicolas Sarkozy aka the French president burst on the scene. He divorced his second wife while in office, hooked up with Italian-French supermodel-turned-singer Carla Bruni couple of months later, and is now scandalising nations by travelling with her on official tours. But while Saudi Arabia firmly asked President Sarkozy, 52, not to bring his girlfriend along on his trip to the country, India said it is ready to treat Bruni, 40, as France`s first lady if she accompanies him on his state visit to India later in January.
In pic: President Sarkozy and Bruni, accompanied by her son Aurelien, tour the ancient Nabatean city of Petra in Jordan.
Text: Surya Praphulla Kumar
Images: Getty

Good Old Saudi Arabia, one of the most sexually repressed nations in the world has issues about the president's girlfriend but has no qualms about financially supporting terrorism and treating women like live cattle ?

***

He wouldn't be the first French political leader to get things right stylistically while floundering politically. French president Nicholas Sarkozy is taking a pounding in the polls, but when President Bling Bling, or Nicholas 1st as he is being called, bought his soon-to-be-wife Carla Bruni a pink diamond engagement ring he was right on track with a surging interest in coloured diamonds.


The ring Sarkozy gave Bruni is a heart-shaped pink diamond "Cupidon" ring by Dior fine jewellery designer Victoire de Castellane.


"Coloured, or fancy diamonds as they are properly called, are indeed the hot thing in gemstones," says Duncan Parker, vice-president at Harold Weinstein Associates in Toronto, which provides grading for diamonds. "We're probably seeing five to 10 times as many coloured diamonds coming through the lab as we may have seen five years ago."

Last December at an auction in Sotheby's Hong Kong, a 6.04-carat blue diamond sold at $1.2-million per carat for a total of $8-million, the highest amount paid per carat for a diamond at auction.


Diamonds are rare and coloured diamonds are very rare, "the top of the gem category" says Mr. Parker. "They can be pretty much any colour, but the most rare is red. You hardly ever see that. For the natural pinks, you might find one carat in a thousand. For a certain pinkish/purple, perhaps one in a million."


After that, the most sought-after are the blues, pinks, purples, greens and yellows. Greys and browns have historically been considered the lesser of the coloured diamonds, but even brown diamonds have become trendy lately.


Most of the naturally pink diamonds come from the Argyle mine in Australia ( more on Argyle Mine here ), the blues from South Africa, while yellow diamonds are the most prevalent of fancy diamonds --anomalies that can pop up in any diamond mine, including the Ekali mine in the Northwest Territories. Still, they don't make up even 1% of that mine's output, according to industry sources.


Of course, jewellers prefer not to use the term "trendy" when referring to the pricey gems. But even hardened industry experts trace the current fashion for coloured diamonds back to the pink diamond engagement ring Jennifer Lopez wore in her "Bennifer" period.


Coloured diamonds might just be the pinnacle of sophistication -- that extra dimension of colour in a beautiful stone adding one more thing to delight the senses. When you stop to think about it, the most legendary diamonds are the coloured diamonds. The famous blue Hope diamond from India now in the Smithsonian tops the list. Then there is the canary-yellow Tiffany diamond from South Africa, now a showpiece at the famous jeweller's flagship store on Fifth Avenue in New York, and the Dresden Green from Brazil.


As with many things in the luxury world, the "mainstreaming" of a rare market is becoming a fact in the coloured diamond industry. While few of us will ever see a rare, naturally pink diamond in our lives, the diamond industry has a number of new treatment technologies to produce fancy diamonds in commercial quantities at a fraction of the cost. The dazzling gems that were once the exclusive domain of royalty, aristocrats and the very wealthy may not be within coming so for the merely rich.


The most popular methods of artificially producing coloured diamonds include coating colourless diamonds, boiling the gems in sulphuric acid and "bombarding" already slightly coloured diamonds to enhance their colour.


Coating involves applying a surface coating which can improve the colour of the stone by six or seven colour grades. While the idea of coating diamonds might smack of cheating, the established method is sometimes used with colourless diamonds to make them a more dazzling white.


Bombarding involves irradiation -- radiation by controlled exposure to radioactivity. Though this sounds slightly scary, it is just mirroring the process that coloured diamonds went through in nature millions of years ago. Green diamonds, for example, owe their colour to exposure to radioactive materials such as uranium.


Irradiation has come a long way since the 1930s, when attempts to enhance the colour of diamonds with the procedure caused the jewels to become radioactive. "You had these priceless gems that glowed in the dark," says Shelly Purdy, a Toronto designer of fine jewellery.
Even technologically enhanced diamonds are considered more valuable then other naturally coloured gemstones -- they are still diamonds after all.


"Top to bottom, all things being equal, the most valuable diamonds are natural fancies, then colourless, then bombarded, then coated ones," says Mr. Parker. "A bombarded diamond could be 20% less expensive then a naturally coloured one, and a coated diamond 60% less, which could still be more then a sapphire," he adds.

Source: Karen Burshtein, Financial Post Published: Saturday, March 15, 2008

***

The above story neglected to mention HPHT diamonds and cultured pink and blue diamonds.

North Australian Diamonds Ltd has teamed up with Top End Uranium Ltd. Don't be surprised if a natural green diamond is unearthed in the near future. Green diamonds are coloured by uranium.

We have heard rumours that a green diamond kimberlite deposit has been well known now for quite a while but those in the know are not ready to market them until the pinks are nearly all gone.

We expect marketing and business strategies have to be considered.

***

Diamond Imports

Fancy Coloured Diamonds


Subscribe in a reader

Saturday, March 15, 2008

The World's Billionaires List


Special Report

The World's Richest People

Edited by Luisa Kroll and Allison Fass 8th March 2008

It has been a busy year for Forbes' team of fortune hunters. Strong equity markets combined with rising real estate values and commodity prices pushed up fortunes from Mumbai to Madrid. Forbes pinned down a record 946 billionaires. There were 178 newcomers, including 19 Russians, 14 Indians, 13 Chinese and 10 Spaniards, as well as the first billionaires from Cyprus, Oman, Romania and Serbia.

Ingenuity, not industry, is the common characteristic; these folks made money in everything from media and real estate to coffee, dumplings and ethanol. Two-thirds of last year's billionaires are richer. Only 17% are poorer, including 32 who fell below the billion-dollar mark. The billionaires' combined net worth climbed by $900 billion to $3.5 trillion. That equates to $3.6 billion a piece.

The average billionaire is 62 years old, two years younger than in 2005. This year's new billionaires are seven years younger than that. Of list members' fortunes, 60% made theirs from scratch

***

Diamond Imports

Affordable Unique Diamonds


Subscribe in a reader

Eureka ! Polished Diamond Prices Increasing Part 2

In January we said :" What people fail to recognise is the eventual price increase in the one to two carat diamonds will be due to the adjustment in prices once consumers realise how more affordable they are in comparison to the rarer larger diamonds.It will be a natural flow on effect."

Yesterday's price increases in the 1 carat to 2 carat sizes in Rapaport's list price has proven us correct. Prices in these sizes were stagnant for a long time compared to the 4 carat plus sizes.

This is the beginning of the diamond boom we have all been expecting. The US dollar is almost equal parity ( USD$1.00 = AUD$0.93 ) with the Australian dollar compared to AUD$0.70 to AUD$0.75 three years ago.

Now it's time to buy before the expected rough increases which will be inevitable to gain the advantage and before diamantaires hold back their stock to maximise their capital gain.

There is an electricity in the air. The mad frenzy will be seen in the following weeks as we expect higher prices in Basel culminating in Las Vegas by June this year.

Congratulations to Peter F who locked in at AUD$33,000 on a beautiful round brilliant 1.15 carat D IF Ex Ex last week saving himself nearly AUD$2,000 based on the new price increase.

We estimate this diamond will be worth close to AUD$40,000 by the end of the year.

In 1980, the last diamond boom, a one carat round brilliant diamond D IF achieved the epic price of USD$60,000.

Please view our new Internally Flawless diamond section.

ALL OUR DIAMONDS ARE IN STOCK !

~~~

Eureka !

Eureka ! Supposedly shouted by Archimedes (c.287-212 B.C.E.) when he solved a problem that had been set to him: determining whether goldsmiths had adulterated the metal in the crown of Hiero II, king of Syracuse.

Likewise this exclamation is synonymous with the Australian gold rush days when gold diggers discovered gold.

The US dollar is under siege and yesterday the gold price burst the USD$1,000 per troy ounce barrier mark as expected. It will not stop there. We believe it will hit USD$3,000 per troy ounce by 2010 due to both Chinese and Indian demands of the ever growing new middle class.

One troy ounce is 31.103 grams for those who need to know before rushing off to find your pocket calculators.

History has repeated itself once again. A weak US dollar leads to a higher gold price to compensate for the difference.

Likewise diamonds too are being affected. Diamond prices are increasing also to compensate for the weakening US dollar plus there is further speculation that the price of rough is expected to increase this year as high as 9% which would have enormous flow on effects for cut and polished diamonds.

The increase in the price of rough diamonds is a natural process because De Beers and other miners simply want more for the rough if the the US dollar's purchasing power is less.

Yesterday there were many increases in diamond prices right across the board in many sizes, colours and clarities.

We predicted this would happen in the one carat sizes because these sizes were being mostly ignored last year in favour of the larger prestigious sizes from four carat and above. The large diamond sizes increase in prices happens these days almost automatically.

It was only logical to assume the 1.00 to 1.25 caraters ( four to five grainers) would increase because the affordability would increase the demand.It was just a matter of time and diamond traders patiently waiting for the end of the Hong Kong fair two weeks ago as the litmus test confirming this.

The fabled one carat round brilliant excellent cut D colour internally flawless hit USD$21,100 from it's previous list price of USD$19,100. We remind those who knew that the price was sitting on USD$18,100 for the best part of last year.

Prices in the larger diamonds have increased even further.

As predicted in our our Part 1 story ( link above ),which we noticed had been grabbed by other diamond information websites and which we find flattering, the price of diamonds are increasing and we are in the beginning of a new diamond boom.

It is the perfect time to buy diamonds with a weaker US dollar. For those of us who are fortunate not be living in America, the country with the worst possible ever tasting coffee in the world, it's not often prosperous times and a weaker dollar go hand in hand.

It's inflationary and inflation increases precious metal and diamond prices for those who seek that financial hedge compared to the safe 8% achievable interest now being offered by Australian banks.

But beware of the pitfalls when purchasing diamonds. There is a risk if you buy from an inexperienced diamond vendor with no credentials.

Beware of website diamond dealers promoting themselves via adopted spread sheets of diamond lists advertising diamonds from overseas with bogus diamond grading reports.

Only deal with a diamond vendor who has the diamond in stock for immediate sale certified by a recognised independent diamond grading report and have the report and the diamond verified as a precaution.


Hoooroooo from De Guru

***

Record Diamond Prices Spark Fears

Over Speculation

Reuters Wed Mar 12, 2008

By David Brough - Analysis
LONDON (Reuters) - Strengthening demand for top quality diamonds has pushed prices to world-record highs, but investments in the gemstones could sour if economic turmoil forces speculators to flood the market.

Surging global economic growth and a rapid fall in the dollar have pushed commodity prices, including the rarest polished diamonds, to all-time peaks in recent months.

Diamond entrepreneur and analyst Martin Rapaport, who runs an electronic wholesale polished diamond trading network, has issued a stark warning on the dangers of speculative pricing by dealers, also known as diamantaires, trading with each other.

"Many diamantaires, having lost confidence in the dollar and expecting increasing large diamond prices due to a consistent imbalance between supply and demand, now prefer to keep their wealth in diamonds instead of dollars," Rapaport said on his diamond news service.

"Higher prices brought about by internal diamond industry speculation are not sustainable and may result in significant financial loss," he said.

"If a significant component of the price level is based upon internal diamond industry speculation that prices will continue to rise, then even a slight short-term decline could cause a collapse."

WORLD-RECORD PRICES

Surging demand for the world's most magnificent diamonds has driven prices to all-time highs.

Rapaport told Reuters a 10-carat "D" flawless diamond would now sell wholesale for around $155,000 a carat, up from about $110,000 six months ago.

Rapid growth of emerging economies such as China, India and the oil-rich Middle East Gulf states has multiplied the number of multi-millionaires, many of whom are willing to pay ever higher prices for fabulous jewelry and rare gemstones.

An extremely rare 72.22-carat diamond is expected to bring up to $13 million when it goes to auction next month -- that is up to $180,005 per carat, which would make it the most expensive diamond ever sold at auction in Asia.

A Pear-shaped D-colour flawless 72.22 carat diamond is shown during a press preview at Sotheby's Auction House in New York, March 11, 2008. Strengthening demand for top quality diamonds has pushed prices to world-record highs, but investments in the gemstones could sour if economic turmoil forces speculators to flood the market.

The diamond was previewed in Manhattan this week and will be offered on April 10 at Sotheby's Hong Kong galleries.

In November, Sotheby's sold a huge flawless brilliant-cut white diamond, weighing 84.37 carats, for nearly 18.2 million Swiss francs ($16.21 million) to Guess Jeans founder Georges Marciano, who named it the "Chloe Diamond" after his daughter.

The diamond achieved a world record price per carat for a white diamond ($191,980), and was the second most expensive stone ever sold at auction, only eclipsed by the 100.10 carat "Star of the Season" diamond, which Sotheby's sold for $16.5 million in May 1995.

De Beers, 40 percent owned by Anglo American ,which supplies about 40 percent of the world's rough diamonds, believes speculative pricing does not feature at its so-called "Sights", at which its clients buy stones, an official told the Reuters Global Mining Summit on Tuesday.

"We are not taking any large stones and auctioning them," said Sheila Khama, chief executive of De Beers Botswana.

" FRIEND NOT AN ENEMY "
Varda Shine, managing director of De Beers' Diamond Trading Company (DTC), its London-based distribution and sales arm, said in a speech to a diamonds conference in Israel last month that diamonds will become more and more sought after.

"Over the past decade we have seen the rise of new economic powers ... of China, of India and in South America," she said.

"The trend is set to grow over the coming decade and these economies will play a major role in growing demand."

Shine, who has said global diamond supplies will remain stable because of a lack of major new discoveries, said scarcity of diamonds can become an opportunity for the diamond business."If, as an industry, we can maintain and grow consumer demand ... then we can make scarcity our friend and not an enemy to be feared," she said.

Evy Hambro, a fund manager at BlackRock Merrill Lynch Investment Managers, said mining companies were not making any important new diamond discoveries.

"Their exploration expenditure has gone up many times and the commensurate result you would have expected ... hasn't arrived," he said. "It has been extremely disappointing.""Assets for tomorrow haven't been discovered."

Because of the scarcity of big diamonds and the strong demand, Rapaport does not expect prices to fall any time soon.

***

Diamond Imports

All Our Diamonds Are In Stock


Subscribe in a reader

Friday, March 14, 2008

GIA " The Internet Certificate "

TRADE ALERT
~~~

GIA = " The Internet Certificate "

~~~

GIA’s Gem Trading Laboratory graded diamond reports are now considered inferior and are being referred to as the “Internet Certificate “

*

In light of the GIA bribery scandal ," Certifigate " , and our strong support of Chaim Even-Zohar's revelations we refuse to stock ANY NEW GIA graded diamonds offered to us both for ethical reasons and many inaccurate diamond colour and clarity grades.

*

In addition we do not approve of the GIA cut grading system. It simply does not make any sense. GIA excellent cut diamonds with 62% tables are in our opinion misrepresentations and confuse any serious buyer.

*

Likewise anyone dealing in GIA graded diamonds is NOT someone we wish to deal with until GIA’s Gem Trade Laboratory decides to disclose the bribers and comes clean in order to inadvertently avoid dealing with a GIA briber.

" It is worthwhile remembering that bribery is a predicate anti-money laundering offense. Anyone knowingly doing business with a company where the sources of money may have been derived from money laundering activities i.e., from bribery, is failing in his due diligence and is breaking the law himself. " : Chaim Even-Zohar

*

We have a duty of care to our clients.

*

We are strongly urging potential clients prior to purchasing GIA graded diamonds to verify the report specifications as a precaution with an independent International Diamond Council diamond grading laboratory such as HRD or DCLA who we believe are honourable and accurate.

*

I suggest other diamond vendors do the same.

*

Thank you for your kind understanding,

Daniel F Katz GG
Sydney Australia

***

Diamond Imports

Fair Trade Diamonds


Subscribe in a reader

World Gemological Institute Collaborates with SSEF Swiss Gemological Institute


World Gemological Institute and SSEF Swiss Gemological Institute have initiated a collaboration program intended to enhance the understanding of diamond treatments and their detection methods.

World Gemological Institute research staff members have visited the SSEF Swiss Gemological Institute in Basel, Switzerland, to acquire frontier knowledge concerning the latest findings in the field of diamond treatment detection. Among the technologies reviewed were advanced spectroscopic methods including laser induced photoluminescence, FTIR and UV/VIS spectroscopy.

Also discussed were applications in the detection of color enhancement treatment in fancy colored diamonds and color removal in brown diamonds.

World Gemological Institute is aspiring to extend the scientific database available for research into the nature and complexity of diamond treatments.

It is hoped that the joint effort will add significant insights into treatment detection and consumer education. This collaboration will include knowledge sharing in many aspects of diamond and gemstone research.

Yinon Feldheim, CEO of World Gemological Institute, had commented, "This initiative is very important to us. With great appreciation we start the international research cooperation with leading gemological research centers like SSEF. The market is constantly looking at gemological institutions to support the trade in handling the issue of lab grown and treated diamonds. We are planning to dedicate the major portion of our resources to provide the consumers and the trade with tools and methods to better understand enhancements and treatments."

Feldheim further added, "We are currently increasing our research staff and are investing in the most advanced spectroscopic research equipment available to be in a position to actively contribute to the scientific challenges our industry is facing."

About SSEF: The SSEF Swiss Gemological Institute, part of the Swiss Foundation for the Research of Gemstones (SSEF: Schweizerische Stiftung für Edelstein-Forschung) was founded by trade organizations in 1976.

SSEF is a member of CIBJO and ICA and highly reputed for diamond grading, testing color of diamonds, detection of HPHT treated diamonds, origin determination of colored stones and pearl identification.

Close collaboration with major University departments provides the SSEF with constant assistance as far as staff and instruments (e.g., scanning electron microscopy at University of Basel or LA ICP MS at University Bern) are concerned. Research results are published in international scientific journals for gemologists throughout the world.

About World Gemological Institute: Founded in 1977, it is a state-of-the-art diamond grading facility as well as a gemological research and education centre.

The World Gemological Institute is poised to help define the next generation of diamond grading services. In addition, World Gemological Institute also undertakes innovative gemological research to raise industry standards and benefit diamond consumers worldwide.
Source : Rapaport

***

Diamond Imports

All Our Natural Diamonds Are In Stock


Subscribe in a reader

Certifigate 4 : Upgrading the Jennifer Lopez Pink

Harry Winston photo above

Rene Macura / AP file
Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez

The day mega-actress Jennifer Lopez broke her engagement to Ben Affleck might have been a sad one for the unlucky groom-not-to-be, but it may have been a fortunate day for the diamond industry. Lopez returned the 6.10-carat pink diamond back to Affleck, who had bought it in 2002 (for a mere $1.2 million). He then took it straight back to the Harry Winston store where he had purchased it. Why were we lucky?